Prince EWS
Global Moderator
I back their call to play the best side. But to be fair I would've been saying that even if they'd won the first game or indeed even wrapped up the series by the second game tbh.
Even so, the crowds clearly show that noone gives a crap about the series.Is their last cricket at home for 12 months.
Considering factors such as the home conditions & the diabolical state of their opposition, that's a pathetic vote of confidence by the Lankan team/selectors. Almost equivalent to the All Blacks feeling they need to play their absolute full strength side to play a second string Welsh rugby team in New Zealand.Nah you're missing the point. They planned on changing the team around a lot in the next game if they won the first one - that was the youth policy - but now that the series is on the line they're going to have to stick to their strongest eleven which is the side that played the first ODI.
cricinfo said:Sanath Jayasuriya, Sri Lanka's chief selector, said the other day, "If they are not at full strength I don't see why we should be at our full strength", which could be a good signal for the young guys.
You can have Matthew Wade if you really want himOnly 7 all-rounders. Just a shame we don't have a keeper that can also bowl, to really give the side the desired MULTI-SKILLZ feel.
Would happen to most sides missing their top 5 ODI batsmen to be fair.Wow - I hope they prove me wrong (not that they'll get to bat due to rain) but that is perhaps the weakest NZ top 6 I can remember.
Fulton or Franklin, no thanks, been there done that, although I will grant you Watling.Dare I say it, but I'd far prefer to see Fulton and Franklin (and obviously Watling) out there.
PS Millsy!