• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in India 2013 Short formats

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Dean jones tweeted

"Now 3 double hundreds in last 2-3 years.. new rules.. flat decks.. weight training.. big bats.. "

Hahaha, Asian guys doing well, now I m really expecting some nice criticism of the change in rules..
**** off troll.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
To the ****s that think Australia are chasing this. You are forgetting that its Australia who are the ones who have big scores scored against them chasing. Never happens in reverse.

Australia all out 128. Kohli 5-fer.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
If Watson hadn't got injured then India might've struggled to get more than 320; firstly because he could've finished his allotment but more importantly so Henriques wasn't on the field when Rohit offered a chance.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Australia shouldn't panic about this chase. Neither of India's incredible chases featured extraordinarily fast starts, they just kept wickets in hand and couldn't be stopped. Early wickets and the games dead. They need to take it deep.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
If Watson hadn't got injured then India might've struggled to get more than 320; firstly because he could've finished his allotment but more importantly so Henriques wasn't on the field when Rohit offered a chance.
Oi bloke, at what odds are India (not Australia) value in this match?
 

Top