ohnoitsyou
International Regular
Playing out just like last innings so far
Could you rephrase this? I don't quite understand what you are suggesting here..Because Test cricket isn't some sandbox for kids who average 70 on A tours. And no-one in the game would argue Sodhi has a hardened and unsentimental temperament that's poles apart from Martin Crowe's at the same age either; he's a very young 20-year-old by modern standards. He's not one of these guys who's targeted cricket as a career path despite it being about his fifth preference as a pure sport, because he sees the game as weak. Having a worldwide connotation with ****ness will hurt him bitterly.
In this test match? No, of course not, but then Bartin's first effort against England would suggest he's a better bowler than what he's done here. We know neither of them are likely to consistently bowl that well. Patel was equally bad against Zimbabwe, South Africa etc and averages something like 60+ in the last two years with the ball in test cricket. That's a more accurate portrayal of his skill level as a player. It's really not much different from what we're getting here. As someone said earlier, the biggest problem atm is that we picked two specialist spin bowlers. That's basically just multiplying our biggest weakness. Since that's unlikely to happen again, unless Hesson etc are really really stupid, this will be partially solved by the next test. Wagner or Southee if he's fit will most likely come in for the second test.jeets in India? really not even close to how bad this pair is.
The guy umpiring his first test has been really good.**** the umpiring has been good in this game- back to the old school benefit of the doubt rule which seems to be employed less liberally with DRS since they are less scared of making mistakes.
But watch it Kane I don't want to make history here let some other team lose.
Cliffs notes - Sodhi is young and impressionable and could get his confidence shattered.Could you rephrase this? I don't quite understand what you are suggesting here..
I don't get this.In this test match? No, of course not, but then Bartin's first effort against England would suggest he's a better bowler than what he's done here. We know neither of them are likely to consistently bowl that well. Patel was equally bad against Zimbabwe, South Africa etc and averages something 60+ in the last two years with the ball in test cricket. That's a more accurate portrayal of his skill level as a player. It's really not much different from what we're getting here. As someone said earlier, the biggest problem atm is that we picked two specialist spin bowlers. That's basically just multiplying our biggest weakness. Since that's unlikely to happen again, unless Hesson etc are really really stupid, this will be partially solved by the next test. Wagner or Southee if he's fit will most likely come in for the second test.
Went well thanks, on a personal level anyway - unfortunately my team didn't have a lot of success. Played on a few nice grounds too, it's a different world over here, no overlapping outfields!how's the cricket going for you in England?
It may be a road but nonetheless if we had've selected another seamer and IFF (with two fs) that bowler had chipped in with 2 wickets early in the piece then we might have gotten amongst Bangers.Seeing some frustrated comments on cricinfo with people saying neither team has been aggressive enough to force a result, but their is only one reason this game will be a draw - roady road
Yeah, it's really not worth getting frustrated about. This is just one of those pitches.Seeing some frustrated comments on cricinfo with people saying neither team has been aggressive enough to force a result, but their is only one reason this game will be a draw - roady road
Hell yes!I would pay serious money to listen to the alternate audio only.