Great shout. Big Nev pulled off some unbelieveable stops. I had the 85/86 season on VHS. The season where we'd won the league the year before, signed the best striker in the country (Lineker), and came 2nd, only to get rid of him the season after and win the league again. Southall was unbelievable in that season though, pulled off some fabulous saves; not seen many blokes that even compared to Southall in his prime. What a man.Seaman was brilliant at his peak. Best keeper I have seen for England along with Shilton. Hart at one stage looked like he may reach that level but has regressed.
Cech was great but not a match for Schmeichel in the Prem though Southall was better than everyone in the mid to late 80's.
Wasn't it Carson, from memory?It's hard to say. He was better than any of those keepers for a while and now he's been worse than any of them for a while. David James at his worst was probably even more dire though tbf.
I wouldn't drop him at this stage of the qualifiers, they've made that mistake before with Schteve bringing in Foster for the crucial Croatia game. From what I've seen Ruddy is a really good keeper and none of the Norwich fans seem to think any different, I'd really be thinking about bringing him in for some friendlies before the World Cup (if they qualify). But you never really know how keepers will react to the increased exposure etc.
He was certainly immense when he played that one time for Bradford too...It's a shame Southall was turd in the 90s because he really was immense in early career from all I've seen
Yeah I think you're right about it being Carson.Wasn't it Carson, from memory?
To be fair Robinson was in uber turd form beforehand anyway (his performance in Croatia arguably dropped us in the mire in the first place; airkicked a Comrade Gary backpass, I think), so there's every chance he'd have been just as shyte anyway.
I'd always prefer a coach to have the balls to change things rather than stick with the status quo. I always think of the Trott for Ravi move in the 5th test that won us the Ashes in 2009.
Don't remember that, at his best he was one of those keepers that puts in a great performance one week and a shocker the next. At worst he was agonising to watch, like a bad British sitcom where a fairly likable man keeps finding new and innovative ways to humiliate himself in front of the whole world.Foster on his days a pretty good keeper, though for all his flashy saves for WBA he always came accross as having poor footing to me, never had a decent jump when at Utd. If he wasn't injured I'd suggest him in for Hart. Not 100% sure on the others ahead of him though.
Was a fan of Rob Green though, yeah he had his howler in a World Cup of all places, but always seemed dependable for West Ham.
Rob Green was (and may still be) one of those keepers who'd make a couple of saves each match that'd make the highlight reel on match of the day, which would obscure the fact that he played in a team which conceded a lot of goals. This doesn't necessarily mean he was at fault for any of them, mind you, but I'm always suspicious of picking goalkeepers who play for teams which are basically relegation fodder. They're always going to make more saves than keepers playing for better sides by virtue of the fact that they have a cack defence in front of them and will face more shots. Law of averages and all that.Don't remember that, at his best he was one of those keepers that puts in a great performance one week and a shocker the next. At worst he was agonising to watch, like a bad British sitcom where a fairly likable man keeps finding new and innovative ways to humiliate himself in front of the whole world.
Foster's OK, but he's admitted before he couldn't deal with the pressure at United, plus IIRC he's refused to be in the squad a few times.
Rob Green a keeper in the great tradition of keepers that you yourself were part.Rob Green was (and may still be) one of those keepers who'd make a couple of saves each match that'd make the highlight reel on match of the day, which would obscure the fact that he played in a team which conceded a lot of goals. This doesn't necessarily mean he was at fault for any of them, mind you, but I'm always suspicious of picking goalkeepers who play for teams which are basically relegation fodder. They're always going to make more saves than keepers playing for better sides by virtue of the fact that they have a cack defence in front of them and will face more shots. Law of averages and all that.
The best keepers are the ones who are maybe called into serious action once or twice a game and come up trumps imo. It's hard to judge the quality of a keeper who pulls of a handful of decent looking saves every match but also has 3 goals put past him. Though it's arguable that the reverse may also be true, I suppose (i.e. that a good defence can make a keeper look better than he is).
Yeah that's definitely true. Communication on the pitch is incredibly important for defenders too, it's something you don't get a feel of watching on TV, or even in the stands sometimes.I hate being boring, despite all the evidence to the contrary, but in the end very hard to judge 'keepers unless you watch them live a lot of the time, particulary in these modern days, command of area, which instils confident in defence is generally the main thing. See I never much liked Seaman or Shilton, but everyone said they had that, whilst others didn't.
Tim Flowers for instance looked as good on t'telly as most of them, but apparently not so much otherwise.
Rob Green a keeper in the great tradition of keepers that you yourself were part.
Not being a terrible footballer is also important. One of the contestant features of lower league football is keepers with absolutely terrible distribution.
People have been saying the sorts of things mentioned here for years, but it's infuriating how this sort of thinking hasn't filtered down to (or perhaps up) to the people who actually make the decisions on these sorts of things. I thought the bit towards the bottom about youth systems was especially true.