GuyFromLancs
State Vice-Captain
I think the one thing Lee brings to the Ashes is runs for England. Despite averging about 92MPH, rising to 96MPH when he was pissed off, he went for 42 runs a wicket in 05.I didn't say that Lee was the better bowler - 'Not much between the bowling skills of Lee and Gillespie' is what I said.
Overall, I think that Lee brings more to the team than Gillespie, that's all. But I have no fixed opinion on the matter.
Yes I know Dizzy went for a tonne, but his career was clearly over at this point, whilst Lee would go on to lead the attack after McGrath.
I don't think there's any comparing Gillespie and Lee. Gillespie was clearly far better.
Last edited: