• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

New Zealand A Tour of India and Sri Lanka

Maximas

Cricketer Of The Year
Kusal Perera becoming a specialist in the role of only scoring runs when trying to quickly set a fourth innings chase
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Pretty awful match for the kiwis. Specialist bowlers have 3 wickets between them, specialist batsmen have one 50 between them. So far.

Bits and pieces supposed weaker skills - keeping it from totally embarrassing. Not what I wanted to see.
 

Bahnz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Well tbf it simply isn't a very good team. As mentioned earlier in the thread, only Bracewell, Mitchell, Ronchi and maybe Latham are serious A team selections. The rest of the side has more of a emerging-players kind of feel about it, especially Devcich, Munro, Sodhi and Ellis.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Just looks like a high scoring game to me. The run rates have been very good from both sides. We obvz can't see the pitch but if both sides can coast along at greater than 4rpo then it can't be horrific for batting. Considering our dearth of batsmen in the squad and the short batting orders we've trotted out, 390 is a decent return. A team with Munro at five, Cachopa opening and Devcich at three will always have dubious batting credentials because it has a very pick and mix look to it.

As for the bowlers, well the two developing/inexperienced/not very good atm leg spinners getting schooled by good players of spin wasn't unexpected, and Ellis as the third seamer was more a plan to maintain a balanced side and keep the batsmen in check rather than rip **** up. Bracewell and Henry are getting an education about how joyful being a western fast bowler in the subcontinent can be sometimes.
 

Bahnz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
No thanks. May as well play Southee as a specialist bat.
Ugh, seriously? Since moving to New Zealand, Ronchi has scored 1224 runs in first class cricket at an average of 68, including 7 centuries (two coming for NZA in difficult circumstances). No other domestic regular, including Ryder and Brownlie, has all-round numbers anywhere near that good. Admittedly, he can't open the batting worth a damn. Then again, no one should be asking him to. He's been highly successful batting at number 6 and 7 and both Brownlie and Watling will need to continue putting steady numbers on the board in order to ward off his challenge.
 

Kippax

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah and I just posted in the thread tonight Munro's sitting on 775/6 against pacemen over the last two FC seasons tbf. Pilbara Basin FIFO working girl makes good opportunistic coin shocker.
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Well tbf it simply isn't a very good team. As mentioned earlier in the thread, only Bracewell, Mitchell, Ronchi and maybe Latham are serious A team selections. The rest of the side has more of a emerging-players kind of feel about it, especially Devcich, Munro, Sodhi and Ellis.
Whether they are 'A' or 'emerging', I'd like it if the batsmen could bat, the bowlers could bowl, and the bits and the pieces were not needed.

This is the only non weather effected 'test' of the tour, and in seemingly true SC conditions, and it's been a real disappointment to me from an 'A'/Emerging perspective.

Kiwi cricket: same ****, different year.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Last-day collapse coming right up. Was just going to post something facetious about bitsnpieces Devcich holding the side together while the rest of the top order fell around him, but then he got out too :happy:.

Need another Ronchi century to have any chance of batting out the day.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Heh, we were only 4 down when I posted that but didn't bother including Munro in my 'what to do to save the day'... and now he's out and we're 5 down.

22 runs from 6 innings. Yeow
 

Kippax

Cricketer Of The Year
Nah, fish in a barrel tbh. At least you could say there's something to learn from rolling the Kiwis on a day 3 wicket when you're far from fresh, followed by maybe a chase with a bit of time pressure. Instead they just got 20 overs of Devcich darts and some Munro lulz.
 

Kippax

Cricketer Of The Year
Sri Lanka Cricket News: Shaminda Eranga, Suranga Lakmal in Sri Lanka A squad | ESPN Cricinfo

Test fast bowlers Shaminda Eranga and Suranga Lakmal have been named in the Sri Lanka A squad for the first two one-dayers against New Zealand A, in Pallekele. Offspinning allrounder Ramith Rambukwella and legspinner Seekkuge Prasanna are the other entrants to the squad that is currently in Dambulla for the second four-day match.

Fast bowlers Nuwan Pradeep, Vimukthi Perera and Madura Lakmal, and allrounder Dilruwan Perera, made way for the new additions, from the four-day side, but Sri Lanka A's batsmen were unchanged across formats, with Dinesh Chandimal set to remain captain.

Eranga and Lakmal's inclusions are aimed at providing match practice for the pair, who have no international cricket scheduled between August and November, thanks to the postponement of the home Tests against South Africa, and the tour of Zimbabwe.

Sri Lanka A play three one-dayers against New Zealand A, with the third match to be played in Dambulla. The first unofficial Test between the teams was drawn.

Sri Lanka A squad: Dinesh Chandimal (capt), Dimuth Karunaratne, Kusal Perera, Angelo Perera, Ashan Priyanjan, Kithuruwan Vithanage, Sachithra Serasinghe, Chaturanga de Silva, Dilruwan Perera, Seekkuge Prasanna, Shaminda Eranga, Suranga Lakmal, Ishan Jayaratne, Ramith Rambukwella.
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
To carry on my negative assessment of the 'test', now that it has finished.

The bowling, got only 10 wickets in 2 innings, and only 4 of those wickets taken by specialist bowlers.

The batting, only 1 half century in the 10 completed innings by the 5 specialist batsmen.

Not surprising that an NZ team gets rolled on a last day spinning deck. The result doesn't make me disappointed. But really disappointed that none of the 'specialists' grabbed an opportunity at any stage during the match.

That was bad, both performance wise and developmental wise. The badness slightly obscured by the all rounders , as usual.
 
Last edited:

Top