Wasn't Mitchell Johnson, was it?A left arm Western Australian swing bowler make a horrendous debut back in the mid to late 80s. Struggling to remember his name but must have had a severe case of stage fright because he could barely land them on the square. I don't think he ever got another test.
I think that was the spell. Matthews bowled 3.5 overs for 18 runs with 3 wides and a no ball. He got injured bowling his forth over - and what would be his final over in test cricket - but was never going to get another over that day anyway.Oh wow i gotta upload that Matthews horrendous spell at the Gabba, vs WI 1st test yeah?
I think it was clearly evident in his stance and some of his shots that he batted a bit differently as compared to a normal left hander..Sourav? Looked to be an enormously talented and stylish player to me. Despite this small issue he had to overcome I don't think he is really relevant in this thread for mine
absolutely, very well said...You would travel far and wide to find someone who times the ball better than Ganguly, timing is often a sign of what we may call "talent". Yeah it might have been weird and unnatural for him, but he still had natural elegance and timing that someone like Ed Cowan could only dream of
Yap, his timing was pretty good, but changing from being right handed to left handed would have made it a lot more difficult for him. Not batting with your natural stance does bring some limitations in your batting..You would travel far and wide to find someone who times the ball better than Ganguly, timing is often a sign of what we may call "talent". Yeah it might have been weird and unnatural for him, but he still had natural elegance and timing that someone like Ed Cowan could only dream of
Yes Karan, all this is accepted, he changed from right to left and it made it lot more difficult for him and so on and so forth (People often found his footwork so problematic, specially when he was not getting runs...), but the thing is the fact that he has almost 20000 international runs playing all over the world against all sorts of oppositions does only hint at the fact that he was talented enough...actually that even after having so many fundamental things wrong, the fact that he could achieve what he did achieved only meant that he was very gifted, even more so...and frankly, it quite surprises me that the name of Sourav Ganguly is even mentioned in a thread named " Least talented guys to have played international cricket"...it's very unjustYap, his timing was pretty good, but changing from being right handed to left handed would have made it a lot more difficult for him. Not batting with your natural stance does bring some limitations in your batting..