That figures, based on what I've seen of my 11-year old son's little league and school matches over the last couple of years. Lots of well meaning people giving up their time, but the boys don't get to develop their skills unless they're good enough to sign up for one of the top clubs' academies. Instead, there's a premium on size, athleticism and who can kick it hardest. And culturally, it's a million miles away from what I'd expect to see in other more enlightened countries. But you probably know that. btw - any thoughts on why Scotland doesn't produce the players it did until the mid-1980s or so?The big issue is that there's 1,100 coaches in England with a UEFA Pro License.
In Germany there's 5,500, in Spain there's over 11,000.
Twas Leeds who benefitted. They lost 3-0 to VfB Stuttgart in the 1st round 1st leg, and beat them 4-1 at Elland Road, going out on away goals. Stuttgart had named 4 foreigners in their side, so UEFA awarded Leeds the game 3-0, and ordered a playoff to be played in Barcelona. Leeds won, setting up a 2nd round tie with Rangers.The rules I referred to in the early 1990's were the ones to do with a minimum number of that country's nationals in Champions' League matches, which Furball mentioned in relation to Man Utd circa 1993. I think Rangers may have benefited from them against a German side around then too.
Thank you - so it was. Then lost to Rangers in the next round maybe?Twas Leeds who benefited. They lost 3-0 to VfB Stuttgart in the 1st round 1st leg, and beat them 4-1 at Elland Road, going out on away goals. Stuttgart had named 4 foreigners in their side, so UEFA awarded Leeds the game 3-0, and ordered a playoff to be played in Barcelona. Leeds won, setting up a 2nd round tie with Rangers.
Yeah, but your supply line seemed to dry up a while back after producing a string of very good players in the 1960's & 1970's. Unless it's simply down to the increasing standards of living allowing them to partake in the factors Brumby listed.As for why Scotland doesn't produce good players - all the same reasons as England without England's exposure to top class foreign players and coaches.
This is the thing that really pisses me off about Scottish football - it was always the English who developed physical, "if it moves, kick it" players while we developed the small, skillful players.And the footballing culture of "if it moves, kick it" doesn't really churn out skillful players.
Mainly an Edinburgh problem, so it affects our rugby side more than the football side.The heroin, Buckfast and deep fried lard diet probz doesn't help either, tbf.
Yeah I completely agree, it's shocking. It might be to do with how Scotland sometimes defines itself in opposition to England, so when English football grew more technical and middle-class it moved in the opposite direction. Or it might be that no one wants to lose the epic brutality of Old Firm games and it trickles down from there. Who knows, but it's a shame. Scotland were the original passing team and now they resemble England circa 1870.This is the thing that really pisses me off about Scottish football - it was always the English who developed physical, "if it moves, kick it" players while we developed the small, skillful players.
At some point in the last 50 years we've lost our previous identity as a footballing nation and developed this new, **** one.
I blame the Souness Revolution of the mid 80s. Great for Rangers in the short to medium term but it's utterly destroyed Scottish football.
Yeah, I have always been dead against the 'whole foreign players are ruining English football thing' and still think that it is largely tosh but there does come a point when it is going to make a difference, even from a simple numerical perspective, and that is maybe something we are seeing with goalkeeping and strikers position at the moment.I think we all welcome the Ozils and the van Persies to our game as they're world class performers who improve the overall quality of the product and, frankly, we don't have any home-reared cattle of a similar ilk.
It gets cloudier when one looks at the levels below world class; here there is a real argument to be made that cheaper foreign imports do block English players. Look at Richard (sic) Lambert; he's only three games in to his second ever top flight season at the age of thirty one and looks, at worst, a serviceable performer.
Certainly better than hacks like (with an Arsenal hat on) Wreh, Boa Morte and Aliadiere, who all got cracks (and in Boa Morte's and Aliadiere's cases with more than one club too) despite being faintly shyte. Presumably mainly 'cos they were cheap.
The English first division prior to the European ban on English clubs was certainly amongst the highest level of football at the time, if not the highest - similar to the stature it has today in European football. For a good decade The European cup regularly featured an English winner or at least finalist.But they would never have even had the chance to play at a level that high before. Foreigners have added a whole new level at the top of the sport, where the very best English players get the chance to play with some of the best in the world. It's an opportunity that was available to no one pre-1990, rather than one which was available to everyone.
The whole argument is based on that one simple piece of incorrect logic.
Just have to write this one off and move on to next week. Not easy being down to ten men so early though.Urgh, bloody Bradford.
Would probably help i we didn't keep getting people sent off.
Piss off ****.Horrible day. Need to beat that Tranmere lot next week.
I won't be there but we're hardly firing on all cylinders ATM. 0-0 ill bet.We probably won't have anything esembling a keeper next week so you will probably be fine.