flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
The thing is Pakistan's batting could easily fail in the 2nd innings so a 60-70 run lead could be huge for Zimbabwe.
Yeah but Zimbabwe consistently perform better than they look on paper. I don't think Bangladesh could do what Zimbabwe have just done without the likes of Tamim, Shakib and that pace bowler whose name temporarily escapes me. They also have the advantage of not losing their better players to county cricket and other competitions around the world.Nah, Bangladesh have more basis' covered though, they have a good keeper batsman, a world class all-rounder, a good opener and some other decent batters coming through as well as 2 decent spinners and a good pace bowler. I think when the teams played earlier in the year it showed that Bangladesh were a little better, as the first test was played basically the moment they arrived.
I do want to agree, I really do, because I've loved this Test. It just all seems so pointless sometimes though because there's basically a cap on how good a Zimbabwe cricketer is allowed to get, especially if they have parents or grandparents born overseas. What's the point of cheering on Brendan Taylor and hoping he can transform himself from a mid-30s averaging Test batsman to a genuinely Test class 40+ average guy if all it'd mean was that he'd get picked up as an overseas player for a domestic side that actually paid him?This test has shown why Zimbabwe should still play tests at home. Even without Taylor, Jarvis, Ballance they have acquitted themselves well so far. Leaving aside the pay disputes, the standard of cricket is still comparable to Bangladesh in their own conditions. Overseas tests should probably not be played though if countries want to invite Zimbabwe to play then they could continue.
Yeah all of the above.What's the reason for the non payments? Corrupt board or bad investments or lack of International cricket or just the general state of the economy has meant they simply don't have the funds?
That sucks. Someone rich who loves Cricket should fund Zim Cricket!Yeah all of the above.
I wish that the debt you mention was in Zim dollars. $18m Zim dollars ain't too bad, just under 50,000 USD.They're currently $18m in debt atm and I don't know whether scheduling series with countries not named India, England or Australia even gets them a profit. An inept management probably has a lot to do with the state they're in as well, but I'm no expert on Zimbabwean cricket. Chook, Chubb or PEWS can probably explain better.
There's a number of reasons, the primary reason is the cost of hosting teams that don't draw lucrative television deals. Of all the series that Zimbabwe have hosted since there return to test cricket, only the Indian ODI series has been profitable for Zimbabwe. Everything else has cost them millions which is millions that ZC simply can't cover.Yeah all of the above.