Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Don't forget the fact that Starc is going to ton up in this Test, also.Clarke set and Warner still to come. Chances of an Australian batsman getting a big score have taken a sharp rise since Lords.
Don't forget the fact that Starc is going to ton up in this Test, also.Clarke set and Warner still to come. Chances of an Australian batsman getting a big score have taken a sharp rise since Lords.
Plural?I feel as though I'm watching actual batsmen
Yeah. I think everyone is busy revising down their par scores on this deck as we speak. 350 will be very handy.Australia in the better position at the moment.
I counted Rogers and Clarke, I've lowered my standards a little as wellPlural?
But this really is very fine batting from Clarke. It feels like something very significant indeed, attacking England's biggest threat in very helpful conditions like this is the stuff of legend. Kind of reminds me of S. Waugh at the same ground in 1997, albeit in very different conditions.
Yeah, he used to do it brilliantly as wellDire that from Bresnan. Just needs to bowl dry at the moment.
I think it's one of those situations where what sort score would indicate a good batting performance and what sort of score would put you in a good position will be very different numbers. Toss was really important IMO.Yeah. I think everyone is busy revising down their par scores on this deck as we speak. 350 will be very handy.
Agreed. My previous comment about Aus needing to bat for four sessions is looking redundant. They still might do the way Clarke is going, in which case it's game over. But as you say, anything much above 300 is a very good platform.Yeah. I think everyone is busy revising down their par scores on this deck as we speak. 350 will be very handy.
In the car but sounded on the radio like exactly the sort of rubbish call that annoys me.Furball to throw things.
It used to piss me off no end but it's one of those things that you just accept after hearing 200 or so times.bowl dry is a disgusting phrase btw
Now I'm with you. I thought you meant Smith and Clarke.I counted Rogers and Clarke, I've lowered my standards a little as well
Yeah; leg stump is not a stump etc.In the car but sounded on the radio like exactly the sort of rubbish call that annoys me.
Like first chance average?It used to piss me off no end but it's one of those things that you just accept after hearing 200 or so times.
We are awesome, we don't even get excited over bump ballscricketweb.net/forum is a very knowledgeable crowd