The selection of Gillespie is pretty close to the money because the bowling trio of McGrath-Warne-Gilliespie gained more wickets than any other trio in the history of cricket.- Matthew Hayden
- Graham Smith
- Ricky Ponting
- Jaques Kallis
- Brian Lara
- Mohammed Yousuf
- Adam Gilchrist
- Shane Warne
- Jason Gillepsie
- Glenn McGrath
- Muralitharan
Lee brought in a much higher match-winning quality and raised the Warne/McGrath win % by well over 10% to an incredible 79%. That is 4 out of 5 Tests. Lee had the best strike rate amongst all three. These three captured over 75% of all team wickets.
Blogs: The best bowling trios in Test cricket | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
The most successful trio of all time is the one of Warne, McGrath and Lee, even if the other trio of Warne, McGrath and Gillespie gathered more wickets. Probably the next best bowling trio honour should be given to the current English trio of Anderson, Broad and Swann. I would rate Holding, Garner and Marshall next. Wasim, Waqar and Mushtaq would be competing for these two places.
Blogs: The best bowling trios in Test cricket | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
You need to stay off the sauce.Watson > Kallis > Cairns > Flintoff > Oram
Discuss.
Nice trolling.Watson > Kallis > Cairns > Flintoff > Oram
Discuss.
Nice ironic touch too. But as they say, "Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit".Watson > Kallis > Cairns > Flintoff > Oram
Discuss.
Still did better against said sides than Flintoff. The only sides Flintoff averaged under 30 with the ball against where West Indies and New Zealand, with the bat he only averaged more than 40 against the West Indies and New Zealand.Kallis failed repeatedly against the greatest side of his era.
He's also ****ing boring to watch.
No pull shot matches Ponting's.Kallis has a pull shot to rival Ponting's, and freaking beautiful drives. I love watching him bat too. He's no Trott by any means.
There was a period when Gillespie was unbelievably good. Probably the best pace bowler in the world at times during the 2000s...The selection of Gillespie is pretty close to the money because the bowling trio of McGrath-Warne-Gilliespie gained more wickets than any other trio in the history of cricket.
However,
I think that Gillespie's best series was against India in 2004: 20 wickets at 16.14 over 4 Tests !There was a period when Gillespie was unbelievably good. Probably the best pace bowler in the world at times during the 2000s...
Agreed, I understand the Kallis love, but for me, not quite the batsman Ponting was.No pull shot matches Ponting's.
Certainly I'd prefer Ponting in the No.3 position because of his ability to 'take-on' the bowlers. But at 4-5-6 I'd tend toward Kallis' dependability.Agreed, I understand the Kallis love, but for me, not quite the batsman Ponting was.
Just my opinion though.
I remember reading some anecdotal thing by some batsmen sometime that said that Gillespie in his peak was a far more fearsome proposition than Warne or McGrath.
Gillespie was done by 2005 and targeting him would almost certainly have led to failure if attempted earlier in his careerI think that Gillespie's best series was against India in 2004: 20 wickets at 16.14 over 4 Tests !
However, it's a shame that my memories of this great bowler are tarnished by the 2005 Ashes series where Vaughan told his batsman to deliberately target Gillespie and belt him out of the series. This inspired bit of captaincy left Gillespie with an average of exactly 100 for his 3 Tests, and virtually finished off his career.
dont feel bad for him watto. in his last three tests dizzy averaged 85 with the bat and 25 with the ball; arguably the best numbers anyone can have in test cricket - even better than bradman's.I think that Gillespie's best series was against India in 2004: 20 wickets at 16.14 over 4 Tests !
However, it's a shame that my memories of this great bowler are tarnished by the 2005 Ashes series where Vaughan told his batsman to deliberately target Gillespie and belt him out of the series. This inspired bit of captaincy left Gillespie with an average of exactly 100 for his 3 Tests, and virtually finished off his career.
From 2004 in 54 Tests Fred scored 3152 runs at 36.65 with 4 Tons, and took 186 wickets at 30.89. Averaged under 30 with the ball against New Zealand, West Indies, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and 30.11 against India. He then with the bat averaged over 40 against India, New Zealand, West Indies and 38 against South Africa. At the peak of his powers, Fred was a bloody good all-rounder. Doesn't have the Kallis numbers with the bat, but I'd take Freddie in a 3 man seam attack any day.Still did better against said sides than Flintoff. The only sides Flintoff averaged under 30 with the ball against where West Indies and New Zealand, with the bat he only averaged more than 40 against the West Indies and New Zealand.
Also interesting that one of your main deterrents on Kallis is a subjective matter, which has no relevance in a results business. I love watching Kallis bat.
Between 2000-2010, Kallis has taken 217 wickets at 32.88, bowling primarily as a 5th bowler with an old ball and against very established batsmen.From 2004 in 54 Tests Fred scored 3152 runs at 36.65 with 4 Tons, and took 186 wickets at 30.89.