• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lord's

James

Cricket Web Owner
If Lehmann had the chance to actually pick the Ashes squad, does anyone seen him having selected quite a few different players?
 

Ruckus

International Captain
Only just realized too that Botham's 10-nil prediction wasn't actually pure hubris but rather an astute observation on the state of things
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
10-0 obviously a long way off but ill be very disappointed if we lose any Home Tests to this lot.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
The counter-point is that Australia's seam attack is really quite good. Batting is the problem, and they probably still would beat most opposition. Not quite a West Indies situation. But definitely the weakest batting lineup in a long time.
 

Ruckus

International Captain
If Lehmann had the chance to actually pick the Ashes squad, does anyone seen him having selected quite a few different players?
It's futile mate, this is by and large the best we've got. That's why it's depressing, because for once it isn't the result of poor selections or anything like that. We just are sub-standard, and there ain't much we can do about it.
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
If Lehmann had the chance to actually pick the Ashes squad, does anyone seen him having selected quite a few different players?
I think he might have went for Chris Hartley and Adam Voges as the backup keeper and batsman. Just a wild guess, I don't have any real reasoning behind it.
 
Last edited:

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The counter-point is that Australia's seam attack is really quite good. Batting is the problem, and they probably still would beat most opposition. Not quite a West Indies situation. But definitely the weakest batting lineup in a long time.
Indeed. If only trading existed in test cricket :p
 

Spark

Global Moderator
It's futile mate, this is by and large the best we've got. That's why it's depressing, because for once it isn't the result of poor selections or anything like that. We just are sub-standard, and there ain't much we can do about it.
Yep. And this is the **** they produce.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
10-0 obviously a long way off but ill be very disappointed if we lose any Home Tests to this lot.
Shouldn't count your chickens before they hatch but would England rest Anderson and/or Swann if they go 3-0 up?
 

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hey NUFAN,

Based on your 'Ordfinary away: Go for the draw' thread - what team would you be picking for Australia?
 

pup11

International Coach
You have some very good players? You might want to pick them.
If one wants to judge these players on their inabilty to play spin, then yeah.. they are pathetic players but you gotta to remember that these guys don't get to play any sort of decent spin back in Australia which is evident from the Aussie spin stocks, so playing spin or reverse swing is something, they are having to adapt to at the international level which is never easy. Also these are young batsmen and bowlers who are being thrown into the deep end with a new role after every game, such impatience never works with young players especially in a team where the senior players themselves aren't performing.
 

Top