Haha that honestly didn't seem that obvious.Think DoG might've been being a bit sarcastic...
but would andrew symonds?why would Swann give a **** about those footmarks? Even Ed Cowan wouldn't go fishing out there
Agar's bowling has forced me to dig deeper. Australia have dismissed 11 batsmen for 99 in their 756 test history, at an average of one 99 dismissal per 68.72 tests. It's now about 130 tests since we last dismissed someone for 99. we're due guys.this amazing moment is the last time australia got a person out for 99 (in a test)
COMPLETE FAIL BATTING ON 99* - NEIL McKENZIE 2002 vs AUSTRALIA - YouTube
Let Patto destroy his own confidence and Harris his own bodyDeclare or not?
Actually given how popular symonds was on this forum would he make the current Aus team?but would andrew symonds?
my ****ty brain is trying to tell me the average in all of test cricket is a 99 dismissal per 25.8 tests so we're really off the pace. or i've done this all wrong. i've probably done this wrong. it doesn't matter. steve smith is back on. exciting cricket is back.Agar's bowling has forced me to dig deeper. Australia have dismissed 11 batsmen for 99 in their 756 test history, at an average of one 99 dismissal per 68.72 tests. It's now about 130 tests since we last dismissed someone for 99. we're due guys.
Yeah I agree. Strauss thinks they won't though and that makes me think they won't.Declare. Take 3 or 4 tonight, wrap it up by tea tomorrow. Both sides starting fresh tomorrow could push the game into day 5 and in terms of player management, anything which shortens the game will only help England for the series.
Has to be the plan. This is the grinding into the dirt we were on about earlier. The bowlers are tired so keep on batting for now.Let Patto destroy his own confidence and Harris his own body
Not, bat the day out but pick the pace up (like they are now doing)Declare or not?