Furball
Evil Scotsman
It wasn't though. Prior and Cook were absolutely convinced.Yeah same. The weird thing was how unconvincing the England appeal was considering the circumstances.
It wasn't though. Prior and Cook were absolutely convinced.Yeah same. The weird thing was how unconvincing the England appeal was considering the circumstances.
I don't think we complain about anything unfairly going against us in this match. As far as I'm concerned the Agar stumping decision really should have gone against us, but it didn't and our chances in the match were resurrected from nothing because of it.Funny really. Aus would've won if there was DRS in 2005. Aus probably would've won if there wasn't DRS in 2013.
and thank god for that.Snicko confirms the edge.
No they wouldn't have, Kasprowicz was plumb lbw with about 40 runs to go.Funny really. Aus would've won if there was DRS in 2005. Aus probably would've won if there wasn't DRS in 2013.
Yeah really funny, ****.Funny really. Aus would've won if there was DRS in 2005. Aus probably would've won if there wasn't DRS in 2013.
Surely Aus would have used up whatever reviews were available by the time of the Kasprowicz decision?Funny really. Aus would've won if there was DRS in 2005. Aus probably would've won if there wasn't DRS in 2013.
Yeah, I think if they'd gone up properly, we'd probably not think it odd at all. Yet it happens, plenty of times, even in Test matches, people don't appeal when there's been an edge, one of Bumbles anecdotes goes on about it.Yeah same. The weird thing was how unconvincing the England appeal was considering the circumstances.
There were a lot of wrong umpiring decisions in that game. KP should've been out earlier in the 3rd innings, as should Simon Jones, so you can't really work it out. I'm using dramatic licence.No they wouldn't have, Kasprowicz was plumb lbw with about 40 runs to go.
Lol yeah, given the rest of the site I am not sure you should expect anything different though.bigf00ty is exploding with rage, it's actually kinda ridiculous. i mean they finally got one right ffs they should be happy
England win easily without the Agar stumping howler.That edge wasn't the problem.
Aus win without the Agar/Broad howler.
And pretty much every lineball England LBW was given not out and upheld with DRS, every lineball Aussie LBW was given out, and upheld by DRS.
England very lucky.
1st stage of grief is denial.Are people blind btw? There's a clear mark right where the ball passes Haddin's bat. It couldn't have come from anything else because Haddin's bat was nowhere near the ground nor his pad.
Considering the circumstances though. Would have expected huuuge appeals and an instant review. I'm sure they were pretty convinced yes, but not as much as I'd have expected, is probably just them remaining calm tbf.It wasn't though. Prior and Cook were absolutely convinced.
Trott wouldn't have been out for nought without DRS eitherNo they wouldn't have, Kasprowicz was plumb lbw with about 40 runs to go.