The way the quicks are bowling, he hasn't really been needed.honestly think Agar is being a little under-used, would love to have seen him settle into a long spell this morning or yesterday
If they both tonned up (unlikely) then it's 1-0 us, simple as that really. IMO.This session is where Bell and Bairstow need to earn their test match whites. A pair of fifties would be invaluable, and a century possibly matchwinning.
Sid Vicious back into the attack. Patto looking good. Exciting stuff.
Thanks Gautam.If they both tonned up (unlikely) then it's 1-0 us, simple as that really. IMO.
If a wicket fell before over 80, no. Patto and Twatto looking terrific and Rogers has done wonders with this ball.Would you take the new ball if you were Michael Clarke?
So true but Bell is in the perfect territory where he usually gets out and i expect him to oblige.This session is where Bell and Bairstow need to earn their test match whites. A pair of fifties would be invaluable, and a century possibly matchwinning.
Sid Vicious back into the attack. Patto looking good. Exciting stuff.
No reason to I think they're capable of taking one of these wickets with the ball as it isWould you take the new ball if you were Michael Clarke?
If we take a wicket, no.Would you take the new ball if you were Michael Clarke?
Only person guaranteed to bowl better is Starc. Patto and Siddle doing fine with this one.If we take a wicket, no.
But despite bowling good, we aren't hurting the batting really. Dunno.
Yeah absolutely.Would you take the new ball if you were Michael Clarke?