Yeah it would IMO. 2000 revs per minute is about 33 per second, if you want a quick conversion.Would it not make more sense for the counter to show revs per second?
pfft tell someone who caresBit confused as to why Agar was fasttracked ahead of Lyon here...I mean he looks a decent bowler, but def not so good to justify his inclusion over Lyon, who is no doubt pretty gutted about being left out like this.
wouldn't be so bad if Clarke just gave him a deep pointWhat a match to make your test debut for this Agar kid. If he gets belted all over in test it could damage him like so many other Aussie offies of the last few years.
Because he's not scoring singles.How can you not love Ian Bell
Yeah absolutely. As I said before, The ECB/Sky actually been recording this since at least 2010 so it's about time they introduced it into their coverage. Can't help but think they wouldn't have done so if Swann didn't exist, but hey ho.Yeah it would IMO. 2000 revs per minute is about 33 per second, if you want a quick conversion.
I really like the idea. Fast bowlers have things recording how fast they bowl, so why not have things that record how much spin spinners are putting on the ball?