I just don't particularly rate Khawaja. Strangles the bat with his bottom hand, rigid in his strokeplay. Everyone has been going hard at Watson for not converting 50's to 100's, well Khawaja was getting stuck in the 20's and 30's last time he was playing tests. On debut against England, he smacked a few early on, but then for the next 30-40 runs he got in the game you didn't know where they were coming from, he got bogged down and eventually just went for a big release shot off Swann in the first innings and prodded at Anderson in the second. And that was when he was coming off a shield season averaging 60, now he's coming off two shield seasons in a row averaging sub 40.I'm not sure why the feeling would be horrible if he selected Khawaja ahead of two of your trio.
- Khawaja scored 100 runs last first class match
- He is a specialist number 3 which is likely to be the position available
- Boof has been watching him closely over the past year
- Smith wasn't in the original party and of course Warner has had no time in the middle.
Big fear with Boof (other than selecting Faulks at 7), is his Warne/Chappell "attack attack attack" mantrashook list
✓ spikey
✓ ruckus
✓ burgey
✓ howardj
trust in boof list
✓ uvelocity
✓ n00fers
✓ adub
✓ sparkeh
You've mounted a strong case for excluding Khawaja and if the only spot available was six, I wouldn't be caring as much, its just when I see the number 3 (or 4) spot up for grabs I think he deserves an opportunity.I just don't particularly rate Khawaja. Strangles the bat with his bottom hand, rigid in his strokeplay. Everyone has been going hard at Watson for not converting 50's to 100's, well Khawaja was getting stuck in the 20's and 30's last time he was playing tests. On debut against England, he smacked a few early on, but then for the next 30-40 runs he got in the game you didn't know where they were coming from, he got bogged down and eventually just went for a big release shot off Swann in the first innings and prodded at Anderson in the second. And that was when he was coming off a shield season averaging 60, now he's coming off two shield seasons in a row averaging sub 40.
He's a specialist number three, but you've also got about five openers on tour, who could easily do a job at three (is it really that different?). He's seen him up close with Queensland, but if anything that's what makes me worried. Given he probably knows the bloke well and likes him, there could be other things derterming his potential selection, other than who'll get the most runs, if you know what I mean.
Yeah, Smith wasn't in the original touring party, which is why I think they'll go with Khawaja over him. I just would've gone the other way from the start.
'Cookies must be enabled' returns **** all you ****getting around it: google the headline, click on the result, it will allow you to read it. simples.
also please add gideon to the shook list
or change "theaustralian" to "news" in the urlgetting around it: google the headline, click on the result, it will allow you to read it. simples.
also please add gideon to the shook list
Ironically enough, Khawaja's more an opener than all of them bar Rogers; didn't bat lower until he played FC cricket.Khawaja designated squad member/12th man, I thought Khawaja looked comfortable in his test match career, and I would love to see him back in, but why do that when you can play 5 openers in the team instead. Also, Khawaja shouldn't have an issue coming in at 6, if you can bat in the top order you can bat anywhere.
funny you say that while hughes is in the teamif you can bat in the top order you can bat anywhere.
But if you're Shane Watson, then you can only open.if you can bat in the top order you can bat anywhere.
Blues turn to Lawson for a boostDarren Berry @Chucksaca 1h
@chloejane32 Hughes 3 Khwaja4 Clarke5 Warner6 Haddin7 Faulkner8 Harris9 Siddle or Starc10 and Pattinson11 will be Boofs team. Lyon 12th.
maybe australian cricket sucks because people like berry and lehmann have walked into state coaching gigs and are clearly idiots