BeeGee
International Captain
How about a 84 ball 82? He's in excellent form at the moment.I hope Trott scores a 150 ball 50 and ends up with some red ink to help the average
How about a 84 ball 82? He's in excellent form at the moment.I hope Trott scores a 150 ball 50 and ends up with some red ink to help the average
No. Drop Bell and move KP to open when he is fit to return.Was Botham speaking sense there with his 'move Trott to open' call?
For me, there's only so many times you can hear the same wrong thing repeated - literally just repeated, it's not even making a joke - and still find it funny.I don't disagree with any of that, I just found South Africa's ineptitude hilarious.
Cricinfo disagrees with youFor me, there's only so many times you can hear the same wrong thing repeated - literally just repeated, it's not even making a joke - and still find it funny.
What has GF said that is wrong here? Didn't say they choked. Didn't post any choke pic or meme. Just said their collapse was piss poor just like 2007. You can't tell me that South African lineup was a 8-80 lineup, even against a good bowling attack.For me, there's only so many times you can hear the same wrong thing repeated - literally just repeated, it's not even making a joke - and still find it funny.
Wonder if Morgan will come under any pressure. Unlikely that he will be dropped at this stage but has been in poor form for a while. Remember that distant time when KP was amazing at ODIs and batted at 5? I know his only recent success has come opening but I would not be against seeing him there again.No. Drop Bell and move KP to open when he is fit to return.
Ian Bell averages over 50 since taking on the opening role. To be honest if you want KP back opening you'd have to move Cook before Bell.No. Drop Bell and move KP to open when he is fit to return.
The thing is that, aside from the excellent Anderson, England didn't bowl terribly well as both Broad and Finn were rubbish whilst Tredwell was just Tredwell and the rest looked exactly what they are - part-timersWhat has GF said that is wrong here? Didn't say they choked. Didn't post any choke pic or meme. Just said their collapse was piss poor just like 2007. You can't tell me that South African lineup was a 8-80 lineup, even against a good bowling attack.
It was not a choke, but it was a poor performance. No matter how well England bowled.
"Choking" for them has just become a byword for their general mental weakness surrounding knockout matches. Whether it falls under the strict definition of choking is neither here nor there as far as they're concerned: they have a serious issue between the ears when it comes to these type of games, and they're not going to get out of it using semantics.Cricinfo disagrees with you
England v SA, Champions Trophy, semi-final, The Oval : Gary Kirsten accepts South Africa choked | Cricket News | ICC Champions Trophy | ESPN Cricinfo
... which is so surprising given cricinfo's history of eschewing lazy journalism, stereotypes and cliche.
But then again, Kirsten did say it. I guess South Africa have tried denial, anger, bargaining and depression over the last decade+ and have failed to shrug off the media's obsession with this term, so will the media buy Acceptance? No imo, not while they keep getting such a great reaction whenever they poke SA with that stick.
Yeah but that's definitely not why they lost this game. It's the worst example of a choke ever, seriously. They over-performed to get to where they did, then they had their lack of quality batsmen exposed after their anchor was knocked over by a good ball. They actually managed to claw their way back into the game from a hopeless position from that point. This had nothing to do with mental weakness at all; they actually showed mental strength in this tournament by overcoming their absentees for a while and hanging in there when all hope looked lost in the semi."Choking" for them has just become a byword for their general mental weakness surrounding knockout matches. Whether it falls under the strict definition of choking is neither here nor there as far as they're concerned: they have a serious issue between the ears when it comes to these type of games, and they're not going to get out of it using semantics.
On the ball, and most of us South Africans know this, Kirsten reacted emotionally, because he expects a firestorm in South Africa for some reason and it wont be anything like that.Yeah but that's definitely not why they lost this game. It's the worst example of a choke ever, seriously. They over-performed to get to where they did, then they had their lack of quality batsmen exposed after their anchor was knocked over by a good ball. They actually managed to claw their way back into the game from a hopeless position from that point. This had nothing to do with mental weakness at all; they actually showed mental strength in this tournament by overcoming their absentees for a while and hanging in there when all hope looked lost in the semi.
You can't just say choke, or mental weakness, or whatever, whenever South Africa get knocked out of a world tournament or bat poorly. This time they just didn't have a very good side.