Ray Warren is yet another Nine commentator who should have been pensioned off years ago. Just because he was good 20 years ago doesn't mean he will be good forever.They should give Ray Warren a go, imo.
Brisbane obviously excepted.Seriously pyrrhic victory, though - Ten bid them up to twice what they were paying before and who also got the Big Bash anyway.
Nice position for CA in an Ashes year, though. $500 million cash in hand plus full grounds against the Poms. Now if they just ditched Maxwell's central contact they could solve world hunger.
You wouldn't object to paying when you saw the quality of the terrestrial coverage. Besides, Sky are the only company that actually seem to give a **** about sport.No one in England is qualified to blaggard this arrangement when they have to pay to watch all of their sport on television. A joke.
You wouldn't object to paying when you saw the quality of the terrestrial coverage. Besides, Sky are the only company that actually seem to give a **** about sport.
I can't stand the fact that Sky don't get coverage of World Cups and European Championships.
Was it Channel Four which did the FTA coverage in 2005? Their coverage was ok wasn't it?You wouldn't object to paying when you saw the quality of the terrestrial coverage. Besides, Sky are the only company that actually seem to give a **** about sport.
I can't stand the fact that Sky don't get coverage of World Cups and European Championships.
Actually yeah, Channel 4's coverage of the cricket was absolutely fine, the BBC and ITV's coverage of football most certainly isn't.Was it Channel Four which did the FTA coverage in 2005? Their coverage was ok wasn't it?
awta. He is the worst.Coward is an embarrassment - sucks up to India something terrible. Appalling listening to him.
Really? You are being very generous now about how good he was then.Ray Warren is yet another Nine commentator who should have been pensioned off years ago. Just because he was good 20 years ago doesn't mean he will be good forever.
Think Sky is better, but Channel 4's coverage wasn't really all that bad, was it? Had all the basics, and decent commentators (aside from Boycott).You wouldn't object to paying when you saw the quality of the terrestrial coverage. Besides, Sky are the only company that actually seem to give a **** about sport.
I can't stand the fact that Sky don't get coverage of World Cups and European Championships.