Yeah, this is my biggest problem with the IPL, too.The one problem i have with IPL is ppl getting picked by IPL performance......
Is anyone showing it in the UK this year? I couldn't see it anywhere yesterday. That being the case I'll be paying even less attention to it than usual.Yeah if it wern't so gimmicky I could probably watch most of the games a season muted and not be too bothered by it as it stands its a bit **** but bearable on occasions.
That's a fault with the board and selectors, not the tournament itself.The one problem i have with IPL is ppl getting picked by IPL performance...... Ex: Vijay
Are selector's so blinded??That's a fault with the board and selectors, not the tournament itself.
ITv4 which shows how lowly its rated.Is anyone showing it in the UK this year? I couldn't see it anywhere yesterday. That being the case I'll be paying even less attention to it than usual.
The only issue I have with it is the fact that there now seems to be an unofficial window for it. It's no coincidence that there's very little international cricket during the tournament and it really hurts West Indian cricket especially. For that reason it has a far greater impact than just being a domestic T20 competition.It's just a domestic T20 League. Nothing wrong with it and it gets far too much stick.
Thing is, the board runs the tournamentThat's a fault with the board and selectors, not the tournament itself.
On the flip side, we don't want young cricketers prioritising the development of their T20 skills for financial gain either. Glenn Maxwell earning so much more than Alastair Cook can't really be great for the game.IWhat I do like is top cricketers being well paid for their abilities. With the proliferation of professional sports around the world I think it's important that cricket offers talented youngsters that financial opportunity. We don't want them being lured away from cricket to other sports for financial reasons.
True, but there was quite a bit of international cricket during the IPL last year. England in Sri Lanka, Australia in West Indies and West Indies in England. This year a lot of the international cricket was played just before the tournament, which, coincidence or not, didn't really harm anyone. In a way, I actually think the tournament is in a good slot. It's in between the Southern and Northern hemisphere summers, so it only ever clashes with the West Indies and Sri Lankan playing seasons. Admittedly, it isn't great for both those countries because of that, but there's plenty of time for international cricket either side. Perhaps the tournament could do with being a couple of weeks shorter for that reason though.The only issue I have with it is the fact that there now seems to be an unofficial window for it. It's no coincidence that there's very little international cricket during the tournament and it really hurts West Indian cricket especially. For that reason it has a far greater impact than just being a domestic T20 competition.
I have no issue with it other than that.
I actually think that's the good thing about it. Now you can get into cricket, especially in the poorer nations, and have at least some reassurance that if you don't end up becoming a really good cricketer, you can still make money by shifting your priorities slightly. It is the equivalent of the TV soaps. The fact that they exist do not lower the emergence rate of good theater actors. In fact, since cricket actually becomes more lucrative, more kids might be allowed to join in by their parents, and when you have a bigger pool of emerging players, the probability of finding good test players should increase. Whatsay?On the flip side, we don't want young cricketers prioritising the development of their T20 skills for financial gain either. Glenn Maxwell earning so much more than Alastair Cook can't really be great for the game.