...the constitution and the re-election were going to happen anyway: they had nothing to do with what happened to Taylor. While getting rid of the board will be a good thing for NZ Cricket: those most responsible for this debacle: White and Hesson, aren't going to be touched.
This has gone on too long and we are tired of this crap. The line has to be drawn somewhere. From the sacking of Andy Moles to the "is Greatbatch the coach?" to John Wright walking away it is absolutely crystal clear there is something majorly dis-functional with the way NZ Cricket is being run and the Taylor affair is simply the one where we have to say enough is enough. So McCullum won a one-day series? Whoop de do. Taylor won three test matches in his short run: and each of those wins were fighing, down to the wire wins that could have gone either way.
So you're response to New Zealand's inability to hang on to a coach for more than 12 months, is to sack the latest coach after 6 months? I agree in general Hesson and White won't be touched by this, and that that's not a good thing, but I continue to fail to see how gossip about how everyone in the team hates each other is going to help with this.
Also, please don't rate New Zealand's victory over Zimbabwe as an accomplishment. It was frankly embarassing that Zimbabwe got as close to us in that match as they did. Yes Taylor won two test matches away from home. He also lost 5 in a row (would've been 7 if it hadn't been for rain at the Basin in the 3rd test vs SA). I'm not saying New Zealand's dreadful performances during his reign were his fault, because they weren't. But let's not pretend like his run as captain was an astounding success, brought low by the Machiavellian schemes of the people who cared for nothing else besides seeing McCullum as captain.
And the accusations aren't "baseless." While I wish that the people who made them would "come on the record", we have heard these stories before, reported by other people who have verified sources within the team.
No-one was questioning Taylor's decisions while he was captain until after he was sacked: then all of a sudden the attacks came out of the woodwork. Lets not forget how vicious some of those attacks were, like the accusation from Richard Boock that Taylor was abusive, swearing and cussing out players in the dressing room. That accusation was sourced directly from a player in the team: a player that is probably still playing right now. Taylor wasn't just fired: his character was bought into disrepute by the very people he has to play with now. And right now he's playing in a team where the coach still won't talk to him.
I would say those accusations are no more viscious than the current ones that effectively call McCullum a drunk and a bully, who only wants to play in the team when it's on his own terms. And I would say that people certainly were questioning Taylor's captaincy prior to his axing, at least on these forums.
Look, it's not like I'm happy with the way Taylor was treated, or with the way the NZC has run cricket in recent years. My problem is that this report doesn't really seem to have much to do with criticising NZ cricket or the people who run it, as it does with criticising individuals within the New Zealand team: McCullum, Hesson, Vettori etc. It's divisive bull**** that will serve no purpose other than to drive the players apart from one another at a time when they should really be trying to come together.