"Ferath" is trying a bit too hard though.Garbhajan and Gashwin
He may be talking about guff about Clarke but he's adding some ripper nicknames that will stick IMO.
Yeah I thought so too. Plus whatever he called Jadeja."Ferath" is trying a bit too hard though.
You fail to acknowledge the fact that Clarke is an outstanding player of spin and that he is right up there with the very best imo the only batsman I"ve seen who was better (but not as much as you seem to think) was Brian Lara.Clarke is as good if not better at playing spin than Jayawardener ,Sidhus and VVs.I repeat, how does that show how well he did against Murali? Average in matches involving a player isn't the same as average against a particular bowler. You would think the statsguru friends would do their homework but apparently not! And Burgey, as I said, I am not discounting anything Clarke did. I have just said he plays spin bowling with remarkable alacrity. I just think he gets overrated a little wrt spin play. A level above him you have the Sidhus, Jayawardenes and Tendulkars and a level above that you have the Laras, Vvs' and Zaheers. I don't think Clarke would have played Murali half as well as Lara did in 2001, and Warne would have beaten him to the pulp 9 out of 10 times. Garby, Gashwin, Gardeja, Chuckjal and Ferath combined can hope to be 2 per cent as good as Warne and Murali.
Tim Bresnan apparently... from a loooong time ago.When was the last time Ishant took a wicket...?? what's his avg from England tour??
"Ferath" doesn't even sound that insulting. I mean "feral" isn't the worst quality to have as a bowler... even as a rolling little left-arm orthodox."Ferath" is trying a bit too hard though.
He is able to adjust very late in the shot. There were a couple of balls today when Clarke came down the track trying to work the ball on the leg side, but Ashwin bowled wide. He changed the shot at the last minute and hit boundaries on the off.Clarke against spin reminds me most of Lara, tbh. I don't recall any right hander in recent memory "seeming" to be as light on his feet as Clarke. As was Lara obviously. That's not to say he's better than people like VVS against turn, just that he appears like he has all bases covered. And the results say a bit too.
Does getting an injured bloke count?Tim Bresnan apparently... from a loooong time ago.
I repeat, how does that show how well he did against Murali? Average in matches involving a player isn't the same as average against a particular bowler. You would think the statsguru friends would do their homework but apparently not! And Burgey, as I said, I am not discounting anything Clarke did. I have just said he plays spin bowling with remarkable alacrity. I just think he gets overrated a little wrt spin play. A level above him you have the Sidhus, Jayawardenes and Tendulkars and a level above that you have the Laras, Vvs' and Zaheers. I don't think Clarke would have played Murali half as well as Lara did in 2001, and Warne would have beaten him to the pulp 9 out of 10 times. Garby, Gashwin, Gardeja, Chuckjal and Ferath combined can hope to be 2 per cent as good as Warne and Murali.
Clarke is comfortably the best player of spin outside the Asian countries around today. Who really cares if he is good as Lara or not, I bet Clarke would be pretty happy to be mentioned in the same breath as him as Lara was a genius and Clarke is well on the way to having a record better than the great man. Can't see why people are trying to pick holes in the best bat in the world right now when he is singlehandedly carrying his teams batting like Lara did for long periods.Clarke against spin reminds me most of Lara, tbh. I don't recall any right hander in recent memory "seeming" to be as light on his feet as Clarke. As was Lara obviously. That's not to say he's better than people like VVS against turn, just that he appears like he has all bases covered. And the results say a bit too.