YEah probably, my point s India haven't been pathetic. And if they lose on this pitch it is because their batsman failed.And you remember Watson and Henriques were given when they were not out right? By that measure, DRS has worked in India's favour so far.
**** me.Will rage if Harby picks up two cheap now.
Want the ****er to go back with 0-95 to show for his appalling effort.
i dunno know, if india get smashed, sure. but if they lose in the final session it should probably at least be equal blameYEah probably, my point s India haven't been pathetic. And if they lose on this pitch it is because their batsman failed.
Not saying India have been unlucky because of UDRS or whatever.
Nah after the end of play they replayed it and it showed the ball just missing so it would have been overturned. Same with Watto's which it showed struck him just outside the offstump.There is no way the Henriques wicket would've been overturned by DRS IMO. No way in the world.
Why? Since when is getting a team out for less than 400 in the first innings (if they do it) a bad bowling performance?i dunno know, if india get smashed, sure. but if they lose in the final session it should probably at least be equal blame
he's not a spinner, he's a rock starHow can a spinner not get back behind the stumps? Fmd, basics.
Bull****. If he was a rock star he'd be doing KFC ads in Australia.he's not a spinner, he's a rock star
well i mean why should it be the batsman's fault no matter what? how the game plans out will decide who to blame. if aus in the 2nd innings smash 250 from 40 overs which allows australia enough time to bowl india out, is it still the batsman's fault? the reasons for losing on this pitch, if it happens, could be many, and it could be because of the bowlers, lack of ability doesn't give them a free passWhy? Since when is getting a team out for less than 400 in the first innings a bad bowling performance?
This pitch isn't flat, but its hardly bursting from the seams or anything.