Ingram just bats at 3 and plays a different role to Miller.But Ingram doesn't have anything dynamic about him. Doesn't look classy. Miller looks talented and explosive.
But from memory Miller had to come in and hit from ball one whereas Ingram was given licence to bat that sheet anchor role and just get singles at will. Tougher to have to bail teams out like they often expected Albie Morkel to do.Ingram just bats at 3 and plays a different role to Miller.
Stats:
Ingram: 35 in ODIs, 41 in OD.
Miller: 29 in ODIs, 32 in OD.
I do want to see miller in the lower order if there's a spot, but Ingram gets first choice in the ODI team imo. T20s Miller should be a shoo-in.
Except he averages 65 against Zimbabwe+Ireland and 25 against everyone else.Tbf, an ODI average of 35 is hardly "not international class."
Dang it. Why do you always have to spot that stuffExcept he averages 65 against Zimbabwe+Ireland and 25 against everyone else.
Still very gettable, especially Peterson having overs up his sleeve on this ground. SA didn't use their overs with big Rory picking out a fielder beautifully. They probably could have got 220 had they batted out their overs.Come on Kiwis you ****ing pricks. Do this!
Lots of guys that should be ahead of him.Tbf, an ODI average of 35 is hardly "not international class." I still back Ingram.
Davids looks a T20 type and is nearly 30. Surely they have some younger guys. What about Rilee Rous.?Lots of guys that should be ahead of him.
Davids can come in for Smith.
No but wonder if he is in the mix somewhere.Wouldn't put Davids in ahead of Smith.
Rossouw isn't an OD opener is he?
I've basically assumed that Rossouw is next in line (after Elgar) for tests.No but wonder if he is in the mix somewhere.