-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
**Official** New Zealand in South Africa
- Thread starter James
- Start date
ohnoitsyou
International Regular
on his toes and away he goes! worked every time in junior schoolboy level
ohnoitsyou
International Regular
so there is still swing in the air, Boult has had a rest and jeets is bowling, why am i not surprised.
wellAlbidarned
International Coach
Our last two test victories have involved playing either four seamers or five full-timers, but they're obsessed with trying to polish the turd that is our batting lineup so we always end up with three seamers and dan or jeets. Go figure.
NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Odds on how long before Munro gets a bowl? Will probably partner Jeets to boot...
ohnoitsyou
International Regular
once again our pair have a higher average 
wellAlbidarned
International Coach
Ffs if ****ing Wagner is managing to swing it where's Boult?
there he is
there he is
wellAlbidarned
International Coach
Doully you dumb**** stop talking. They don't lose a review.
oh god you're joking, neither commentator knows the bloody rules?
oh god you're joking, neither commentator knows the bloody rules?
NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
What's he saying? I see O'Brien has tweeted about it too.
Hurricane
Hall of Fame Member
he's all over the shop. But I think he's saying if nz had've reviewed the bracewell lbw they shouldn't lose a review if there's a no ball - it wouldn't be out - but no loss of review because the umpire should have called it.
wellAlbidarned
International Coach
He was saying that it's unfair that a review is lost if the bowling side calls for a review and it turns out it's a no-ball. It's not true, the review is kept since a mistake was still corrected.
ohnoitsyou
International Regular
ffs these cricinfo posters are getting on my nerve, most of our frontline bowlers can bowl in excess of 140 when they chose to.
wellAlbidarned
International Coach
now he's blabbing about how the third umpire should be able to intervene at any time and the DRS taken out of the players hands completely ignoring the amount of time it takes to work out if a mistake was made, in which several more deliveries could've already been bowled. Especially so with spinners. Should tell them to get some cricket web ****s in the box.
Last edited:
jcas0167
International Regular
That is excellent. I remember in the Hamilton test last season against SA, Gillespie was on a roll and got the edge of de Villiers but there was no third slip! Turning point in that game.
wellAlbidarned
International Coach
Amla is looking so ridiculously comfortable. No threat at all here.
ohnoitsyou
International Regular
at least we should get Smith sooner or later 