Spark
Global Moderator
to add to this:Yeah, probably, on the basis that it only takes one decent ball or one mistimed shot to get a batsman out. That's the paradox of batting: takes a ****load of work to make a decent innings and a tenth of a second's misjudgment (if that) to end it all.
I think "form" over, say, 2-3 Tests is a bit misleading unless someone does a Shaun Marsh (or, for that matter, an Alastair Cook). But over, say, 10 Tests? You'd get a pretty good idea. Year-by-year averages are usually fairly representative.
It's also the manner of dismissals that tells you something about "form", in a way. Kohli had done worse than Sachin over the series, but that's because he kept playing idiotic shots, whilst Sachin genuinely looked like he could barely buy a run - even at Kolkata you always felt that he could well get out on the very next ball. I didn't say it at the time but that's why Amla, despite having a poor-to-mediocre run of scores through the middle of the recently concluded series, always looked on the verge of a massive score once he stopped finding ways to get out. On the other hand, Rob "greatest 9 ever" Quiney had a really obvious weakness blatantly exposed by what you'd call decent bowling, so despite the fact that it was only two innings, it was pretty obvious that he simply wasn't up to scratch at that stage.