Unless Hussey repeats his last ashes tour of England.Either way, #6 should stay in Aus favour with Hussey
How often has that happened, excluding days with Raina and Yuvraj Singh bowling?Trent Bridge has always looked fairly pleasant for batting whenever it's been a sunny day and I've been watching.
Clarke would be above Pietersen and would have to put Bell = Watson as both have uncertain form right now?Would be interested with the comparison if Clarke bats at 4 for Australia instead of Watson.
Even this year when it was hot against Windies it was doing lots with the ball.How often has that happened, excluding days with Raina and Yuvraj Singh bowling?
I'd go with that with a * disclaimer for KP as if he joins in no player on either side is anywhere near his level. One of the most gifted but frustrating talents ever in my view.Clarke would be above Pietersen and would have to put Bell = Watson as both have uncertain form right now?
I reckon it's about 80 years - Bodyline and the one before that.When was the last time England won back to back series in Australia? Must have been a little while. Fancy they may sneak a draw.
I suspect we'll be taking a large group of quicks across. Siddle, Hilfenhaus, Pattinson, Hazlewood, Cummins*, Starc, Harris* and Butterworth/Bird/Copeland would be my choice.I don't get to see much of the away series but the bowling worries me tbh. I can't see Siddle and Hilf bowling England out. If Pattinson is fit who else will step up. Cummins may not be fit and Harris seems to be done. Starc is promising but it looks like Johnson has edged back into the reckoning. The English would love to face him again.
I know Pietersen hasn't quite done it yet but I hope by the end of the back to back Ashes..Pietersen does more than enough to prove that Clarke at his best is still behind Pietersen at his worst!!Clarke would be above Pietersen and would have to put Bell = Watson as both have uncertain form right now?
I wouldn't go as far as to call him junk, but a lot of people on this forum over-rate him on the basis of him blasting away ODI top orders at 90mph.Finn is a junk red ball bowler ftr.
You can't help but wonder why the Broads and Bothams have this gift but the Johnsons and Zaheers don't.He does have the knack of taking wickets even when he's bowling tripe.
Johnson's first 3 years in Test cricket were all based on the knack of taking ****loads of wickets despite bowling a load of dross.You can't help but wonder why the Broads and Bothams have this gift but the Johnsons and Zaheers don't.
Were I an Indian selector my first condition for any seamer would be to be a ****ing arsey ****.
I really don't think Broads got that knack at all, hence is occasional horror-figures.You can't help but wonder why the Broads and Bothams have this gift but the Johnsons and Zaheers don't.
Were I an Indian selector my first condition for any seamer would be to be a ****ing arsey ****.
Broad is in a bit of a trough, no doubt. However, hes still in the top 3 wicket takers this calender year. I'm sure the other two are Anderson and Steyn as well. This idea that Broad is garbage is a nonsense.I really don't think Broads got that knack at all, hence is occasional horror-figures.
Finn, does indeed though.