So true.Ashes '09 was one of the better examples of how it's almost as important when you score runs or takes wickets as it is how many you get/take.
I never said he was Ray Lindwall, ****.28 or something. no five wicket hauls. nothing greater than 5 for the match iirc. decent is about right.
who the **** is lindwall, ****I never said he was Ray Lindwall, ****.
Was the largest statistical heist in Test history, I believe. England batsmen averaged something like 6.5 less rpw than the Aussies, which is the largest deficit ever for a winning side.Ashes '09 was one of the better examples of how it's almost as important when you score runs or takes wickets as it is how many you get/take.
All sold out but that was also the case this time four years ago and I still got to twoWhen was the last time England won back to back series in Australia? Must have been a little while. Fancy they may sneak a draw.
What is the situation for tickets up north? (By that I mean outside of London) Missed out in the ballot for the Oval so relying on Lords now.
Ding dong will play. Probably be our leading run scorer as well.As for batting, I am not sure if Bell will come back in India in the 4th test..assuming he doesnt..will England persist with him in the Ashes given his record against Australia or make the bold move of dropping him?
consider yourselves ****ed in that caseDing dong will play. Probably be our leading run scorer as well.
Pattinson > FinnA quick comparison of where I think the teams are today:
Cowan / Compton (=)
Warner / Cook (Eng)
Hughes / Trott (Eng)*
Watson / Pietersen (Eng)
Clarke / Bell (Aus)
Hussey / Patel (Aus)
Wade / Prior (Eng)
Bowlers
Starc / Broad (Eng)*
Pattinson / Finn (=)*
Siddle / Anderson (Eng)
Lyon / Swann (Eng)
Which is 7-2 to England (2=), however * is where I think (hope) it may change Australia's way which would then make a cracker of a series as it would be equal at 5-5
Agree with that but Patel certainly won't play for us.A quick comparison of where I think the teams are today:
Cowan / Compton (=)
Warner / Cook (Eng)
Hughes / Trott (Eng)*
Watson / Pietersen (Eng)
Clarke / Bell (Aus)
Hussey / Patel (Aus)
Wade / Prior (Eng)
Bowlers
Starc / Broad (Eng)*
Pattinson / Finn (=)*
Siddle / Anderson (Eng)
Lyon / Swann (Eng)
Which is 7-2 to England (2=), however * is where I think (hope) it may change Australia's way which would then make a cracker of a series as it would be equal at 5-5
Either way, #6 should stay in Aus favour with HusseyAgree with that but Patel certainly won't play for us.