Tbf from what I understand the main thing the Indians are against technology-wise is the use of ball-tracking programs. Which tbf they do have a point about.Gambhir appeared to edge the ball to slip. It was caught one-handed low to the ground, so the umpire checked with the 3rd umpire whether the catch was clean. 3rd umpire correctly says it was a clean catch, but he's not actually edged it. So the decision of "he'd edged it" was effectively overturned.
This is within the laws as Pickup found but the curious part is that the reason India don't want decisions overturned is because the don't trust the technology - except they do in this situation for some reason.
He is definitely better than Gambhir and Yuvraj.I am not sure if he is one of the top 6 batsmen in India right now. How could I be sure when he refuses to budge from his No 4 position? The way pujara is batting he might be a better number 4 than Tendy but he will never get that chance until Tendy is around.
Hah! Plagiarism I tell youHmm...
Yeah he averaged like 35ish on those two horror tours of England and Australia, and had good series in SA before that. Not the worst batsmen in the side by any stretch.He is definitely better than Gambhir and Yuvraj.
Samit will. Can't see us changing the side to be honest.If either of Yuvraj or Patel play next game I will cut you all
He'd better hurry up if he wants to do it in this innings as well..Just noticed that Kohli hasn't yet made 20 in the series. Interview in this month's Cricketer jinxed him, clearly.
Tendulkar at 80 years old would be a better test batsman than Yuvraj is currentlyYeah he averaged like 35ish on those two horror tours of England and Australia, and had good series in SA before that. Not the worst batsmen in the side by any stretch.