Disagree, it clearly states that if the ball has touched the helmet 'previously', i.e before the fielder has completed the catch by having complete control of the ball, it is not a fair catch.From reading that, it sounds as though a catch off the helmet is okay so long as you've "started" taking the catch before it hits the helmet. So you have to at least get a hand or arm or something to it first.
Anyway, it was out, look in t' book.
edit @ stapel
Ha, another 150.How many do England need to feel save?
if there's a cricketer out there who'll throw away the helmet at short leg or when batting because of an 1 in 100 million chance of it affecting a dismissal, that guy is a ****ing dumbarseIt's kind of a stupid rule anyways tbh. Should encourage more helmets rather than discouraging them.
Swann should be at #8 in India, IMHO. Much better player of spin than Chris jr.
Tbf, Broad did get a 50 against Ajmal and co in Abu Dhabi earlier this year. He's tall so can get a long stride in and hit it far. He just needs to stay away from that paddle sweep.Agree with Brumby about Swann, least he not at 11 this test.
As I said before, depends how our spinners bowl. I reckon a 100 lead should be good enough 9 times out of 10 on here but obviously 150+ would be much much handier.How many do England need to feel save?