flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
No, mainly because he is coming home as his kid is due next week. Small mercies and all that. May as well stay here after that shot.Bell cannot possibly be in the squad for the next Test, can he?
No, mainly because he is coming home as his kid is due next week. Small mercies and all that. May as well stay here after that shot.Bell cannot possibly be in the squad for the next Test, can he?
top three option was not taken and might struggle to get a winner this time aroundOk think will make it prediction sought of thing ....so multiple person allowed to pick an option
1)<100
2) 101 - 150
3) 151 - 200
4) 201 - 250 - Cevno
5) 251 - 300 - Cricaddict
6) 301 - 350 - weldone
7) 351 - 400 - hazsa19,Morgieb
8) 400 > BoyBrumby,Flem274*
How does Sky render hawkeye when the producer (BCCI) has not enabled it?Sky reckon it was one that only clipped leg so would have stayed onfield if DRS was available.
Ah, I see.No, mainly because he is coming home as his kid is due next week.
so if they want to replace him ,trott and samit who will be that ..have not looked into England 16 since askingNo, mainly because he is coming home as his kid is due next week. Small mercies and all that. May as well stay here after that shot.
Bumble said their technology downstairs. Just going off what he said but Sky do have all their own equipment for everything I think anyway.How does Sky render hawkeye when the producer (BCCI) has not enabled it?
Trott will play, Bairstow for Bell will be only batting change and Monty will replace Bresnan I reckon.so if they want to replace him ,trott and samit who will be that ..have not looked into England 16 since asking
Cheers.Sky reckon it was one that only clipped leg so would have stayed onfield if DRS was available.
That becomes pure conjecture when you don't have designated camera or on ground equipment to do the analysis. I agree on second watching it could have shaved leg, but I think it's 70-30 in favor of the bowler.Bumble said their technology downstairs. Just going off what he said but Sky do have all their own equipment for everything I think anyway.
The sweep.But seriously he needs a shot against spin that isn't "hit over the bowler's head for six"
Thought all Indians were of the opinion it was all pure conjecture anyway hence BCCI don't have it and you all say they are wonderful.That becomes pure conjecture when you don't have designated camera or on ground equipment to do the analysis. I agree on second watching it could have shaved leg, but I think it's 70-30 in favor of the bowler.
This was first ball so I think it just edges it.someone needs to make a poll. haddin at cape town vs. that.
And a big **** you to you as well, ****face.Thought all Indians were of the opinion it was all pure conjecture anyway hence BCCI don't have it and you all say they are wonderful.
Cry hard.Thought all Indians were of the opinion it was all pure conjecture anyway hence BCCI don't have it and you all say they are wonderful.
30 overs and Yadav hasn't had a bowl yet.
Yadav's nostrils flaring and raring to have a go at the batsmen
Thought all Indians were of the opinion it was all pure conjecture anyway hence BCCI don't have it and you all say they are wonderful.
And a big **** you to you as well, ****face.
Enough of this, please.Cry hard.