Dhoni would have fund himself in tangles if likes of Donald, Walsh, Ambrose were bowling short at him. Current bowlers possibly as not as mean as above bowlers. Having said that Bevan had problems against much inferior bowlers than above with the short ball.It will be plain wrong to assume that Dhoni has same sort of troubles with short ball that Raina has. Dhoni is much better against the short stuff.
Possibly ONLY Adam Hollioke has been bowling at Bevan in all those matches.Obviously not the same Adam Hollioake who Michael Bevan averages 108 against when he features in the game.
Utter bull**** - seeing as Holloake played against Bevan 7 times and never got him out how on earth did he come off second best against chin music?Yeah, Adam Hollioke producing chin music against Bevan must have occur ed in the outer-space. Both are weak against short ball, but Dhoni is being tested by it, while Bevan was not. And whenever he was tested in international cricket, Bevan came second best of the bowler.
Depends on perspective. UDRS still has a lot of flaws as seen in the recent England series.Bevan's not personally perpetuating the dark ages of cricket with an absurd opposition to UDRS.
Game, set, match.
Has stopped playing much since the 200*.He's skipped a tour but last I checked he was playing ODIs in Aus over the winter and only missed those against England due to a foot injury.
I wish we had a way to quantify effect of pitches and bowler quality. If one considers average of top order Aus batsmen, the average SR is 78.10, far better than Bevan's own.good analysis but did you factor in the pitch conditions and bowling attacks that they faced?
Can you prescribe a threshold?and it would great if someone can do rough analysis of cases of low scoring games when Dhoni and Bevan finished the game.
Dhoni made his debut almost at the same time as Bevan retired.Definitely needs era adjustment. I'd wouldn't make judgements based off 5.5rpo+ chases when Dhoni's average target was 250, and Bevan's was 220.
The highest target Bevan had to chase was 138% of the mean score, whereas Dhoni's was 120% of his mean target.
Statistics alone don't prove much anyway; they're far too open to manipulation and sample size issues.
Oppn Target RR Runs Balls BatPos SR RPO
SL 344 6.88 41 51 5 80% 4.82
SA 330 6.60 3 4 7 75% 4.50 N.O
Pak 316 6.32 6 9 7 67% 4.00 N.O
Ind 316 6.32 49 56 4 88% 5.25
SA 311 6.22 29 27 6 107% 6.44
Ind 310 6.33 65 82 4 79% 4.76
Ind 308 6.16 8 14 7 57% 3.43
Ind 304 6.08 41 43 7 95% 5.72
Ind 300 6.00 6 11 4 55% 3.27
Ind* 225 6.62 12 20 6 60% 3.60
Pak 291 5.82 5 9 4 56% 3.33
WI 291 5.82 31 40 5 78% 4.65
Ind 290 5.80 40 43 5 93% 5.58
NZ 287 5.74 dnb
SA 285 5.70 103 95 5 108% 6.51
Ind 284 5.68 18 28 6 64% 3.86
Eng 283 5.66 45 59 6 76% 4.58
Pak 275 5.50 61 80 6 76% 4.58
So to illustrate how good Dhoni plays the short ball, you've found a video where first ball he gets a lofted edge over first slips head, second ball he pulls a rank short ball which gets up to his chest, and last ball spoons one over cover.Found this video where Dhoni plays a pull shot against a bouncer from Akhtar.
DHONI HITS 4 6 4 VS SHOAIB AKHTAR 2006 - YouTube
He's pretty decent itbt, not many people notice it because he is unconventional (to put it mildly ).
We don't have to prove that Dhoni is strong against the short ball, you have to prove that he is weak.So to illustrate how good Dhoni plays the short ball, you've found a video where first ball he gets a lofted edge over first slips head, second ball he pulls a rank short ball which gets up to his chest, and last ball spoons one over cover.
Hardly a roaring defence.
Did you not read my post? Stunning.We don't have to prove that Dhoni is strong against the short ball, you have to prove that he is weak.
They are all good shots. Just because they are unconventional and no one else plays them doesn't mean ****.Did you not read my post? Stunning.
lol.They are all good shots. Just because they are unconventional and no one else plays them doesn't mean ****.
The balls went for boundaries which is what is required.
First ball was there for a leave outside of stump, and not a troubling bouncer in any case. Dhoni was just being adventurous. I don't know how you could call a short one at Akhtar 's pace a rank short ball. That's he kind of ball that will certainly trouble other Indian batsmen. Third one was again there for leave but Dhoni was being adventurous.So to illustrate how good Dhoni plays the short ball, you've found a video where first ball he gets a lofted edge over first slips head, second ball he pulls a rank short ball which gets up to his chest, and last ball spoons one over cover.
Hardly a roaring defence.
Probably you should have posted extended highlights of his inningsFirst ball was there for a leave outside of stump, and not a troubling bouncer in any case. Dhoni was just being adventurous. I don't know how you could call a short one at Akhtar 's pace a rank short ball. That's he kind of ball that will certainly trouble other Indian batsmen. Third one was again there for leave but Dhoni was being adventurous.
That apart, you can point out instances when Dhoni became victim of bouncer barrage? There aren't many that come to my mind, I might be wing though. He does have a weakness against swinging ball but that is different.