• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** New Zealand in India 2012

Days of Grace

International Captain
Can rain all it wants to, tbh.

If we can somehow escape with a draw, I will jot this down as our warm-up that we should have played before the test match. Real test match will start later this week.
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ooh, play's about to start. Not sure whether I'm pleased about this or not...
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
We're so far off the pace we don't deserve a draw unless they bat really well this innings - want to see us bat at least 3-4 sessions and then if the rest is rained out we'll at least half deserve the escape. Anyway, I just want to see cricket.
 

vandem

State Captain
The ball was missing off stump by some distance
Shame, but the on-field umpire called it as he saw it, in real-time it looked closer. We've all seen much worse decisions (lbw when pitched outside leg etc).

On this point, what's the real reason India officialdom don't want umpire reviews? They allow on-field umpires to refer to third umpire (e.g. 1st innings catches). Can't be cost of snickometer etc as India is the current financial powerhouse of world cricket. If they think Hawk-eye projection is not accurate they could allow the ball tracker to be used up to the point where the ball hits the pad, but not use the projected path after the impact. Could the reason be that they think on-field umpires give more pro-India decisions on home soil (pressured by crowd and atmosphere?) and they don't want to give up this advantage?
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Batting looking pretty challenging out there though the mindset does seem better. Finally adjusting mentally and technically to the challenge... pity it's already fourth day into the first test.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Shame, but the on-field umpire called it as he saw it, in real-time it looked closer. We've all seen much worse decisions (lbw when pitched outside leg etc).

On this point, what's the real reason India officialdom don't want umpire reviews? They allow on-field umpires to refer to third umpire (e.g. 1st innings catches). Can't be cost of snickometer etc as India is the current financial powerhouse of world cricket. If they think Hawk-eye projection is not accurate they could allow the ball tracker to be used up to the point where the ball hits the pad, but not use the projected path after the impact. Could the reason be that they think on-field umpires give more pro-India decisions on home soil (pressured by crowd and atmosphere?) and they don't want to give up this advantage?
No. The reason is simple. India wanted it and got it in SL. There were some teething problems and India didn't know how to use it properly and so the senior players soured on it. BCCI (the organization) doesn't give a crap either way really, but they are backing the [idiot] senior players who are harping about it not being 100%.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
No. The reason is simple. India wanted it and got it in SL. There were some teething problems and India didn't know how to use it properly and so the senior players soured on it. BCCI (the organization) doesn't give a crap either way really, but they are backing the [idiot] senior players who are harping about it not being 100%.
Yeah spot on. It's not a conspiracy or even something planned to gain a tactical advantage; the people making these decisions are just frustratingly dumb.
 

Top