I actually think Tres's FC average was hovering around 30 and maybe slightly below when he got the nod.Presumably talking about the likes of Vaughan and Trescothick, who came in with f-c averages in the mid-30s.
I see, thought you meant these selectors.indeed
Wow. Seriously just because you didn't want him in the side to start with doesn't make it good policy to drop him after (in the last 2.5 years) 44, 7*, (11 month gap), 0 , 22.Anyone but Bopara for number 6 basically. Only the Cricinfo ****wits want him in the Test side. Most people on here wouldn't have had him anywhere near the side in the first place, so it's no surprise they still don't want him in the side after two more ****house innings.
TBF the rest of us Englanders aren't haters, grecian even started a "I don't hate Bopara" thread, and we all seem to be advocating a change.Scaly in not rating Bopara shocker.
yep, which makes it all the more baffling, that they seem to have an aversion for run-scorers at 6. Bairstow had done really well, but it was just for a short amount of time.I see, thought you meant these selectors.
Can't really argue with results there, although I never much rated Vaughan. The good batsmen in the current side are just players that were tearing up the county circuit (Trott, KP) or guys they decided to stick with through a few early lean spells (Cook, Bell).
As I said the horrible mistake was in picking him in the first place. Is there anyone on here who wasn't expecting the ****e he conjured up with the bat? I doubt it. Same old bunny in headlights combined with lazy shots. It's not nearly good enough. ODIs are a completely different format where completely useless Test batsmen are made to look like world beaters. He has been atrocious in T20, atrocious in proper Test cricket and sub-average in ODIs.Wow. Seriously just because you didn't want him in the side to start with doesn't make it good policy to drop him after (in the last 2.5 years) 44, 7*, (11 month gap), 0 , 22.
I think number 6 is often seen as the slot for a batsman who bowls a little, rather than a specialist. Bopara wasn't picked for his bowling but with four bowlers you need other options, ideally a bit better than Trott.yep, which makes it all the more baffling, that they seem to have an aversion for run-scorers at 6. Bairstow had done really well, but it was just for a short amount of time.
Go on, make it a three peat and drop StraussTBF the rest of us Englanders aren't haters, grecian even started a "I don't hate Bopara" thread, and we all seem to be advocating a change.
But he has been picked and not from injury -- This means he needs a run with no thought to how he has been picked.As I said the horrible mistake was in picking him in the first place. Is there anyone on here who wasn't expecting the ****e he conjured up with the bat? I doubt it. Same old bunny in headlights combined with lazy shots. It's not nearly good enough. ODIs are a completely different format where completely useless Test batsmen are made to look like world beaters. He has been atrocious in T20, atrocious in proper Test cricket and sub-average in ODIs.
TBF the rest of us Englanders aren't haters, grecian even started a "I don't hate Bopara" thread, and we all seem to be advocating a change.