• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** South Africa in England 2012

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
It should work that way but it doesn't. Compare the speeds.

RM -> RMF -> RFM -> RF

Shane Bond is RF, Mark Gillespie is RFM and Kyle Mills is RMF.
I always associated it with the early 2000's Australian attack:

Lee as RF, Gillespie as RMF and McGrath as RFM. And Gillespie was clearly quicker than McGrath by that stage.

Although cricinfo lists Gillespie as RF. I'm confused.


I was always thinking along the lines of rvd. It just sounded logical. Then - as we see and Flem illustrates - it doesn't always follow that logic.

which brings me to tthe next question. Who is the one dishing out these labels anyway?

Hash - my man. Boy he is good - just good. Poetry ....
Sometimes it appears completely random. Chris Woakes is still described as RM despite pushing 80mph quite regularly in recent times. You can't read to much into the classification, really. Judge by the speeds on your TV.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Surely once Phallis gets the ton they'll up the ante a little bit.

Like watching Cook and Trott ATM. Only better, of course.
 

mono

U19 Debutant
I always associated it with the early 2000's Australian attack:

Lee as RF, Gillespie as RMF and McGrath as RFM. And Gillespie was clearly quicker than McGrath by that stage.

Although cricinfo lists Gillespie as RF. I'm confused.

Gillespie was constantly hitting 140 and easily into the mid 140s so he was RF imo. McGrath was 135+ish for most of his career so RFM. Lee was bowling high 140 so he was RF+. A medium fast bowler would be Chaminda Vaas. He was 130ish
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
I know benchy especially appreciates this sort of thing.

Hashim Amla is in 90th spot all time for Test runs, closing in on Nathan Astle.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Says the **** who bunkered down in the members bar.
My ****ing ten year old didn't piss off into the shade ffs. When I told him we were going with a half hour left he (rightly) called me a disgrace and said wtte "Next thing you'll want to go and sit in the Trumper Stand you buffoon!"

And you know what? He was right. Had good, hard look at myself and hardened the **** up.

Burgeinho knows......
 

Top