Of course but its hardly impossible. I know of a football stadium that got such a roof simply made of a white fabric at a cost of just £ 10m. Thats probably less than the losses suffered in english cricket just during the last two months. ( and put in a contxt, lords are considering a £ 400m development)there's a bit of a difference between putting a roof on a tennis court and putting one on a full-sized established cricket ground.
well, the wimbledon womens final just had a short rain break and they didnt close the roof. You would just need strict regulations as to how and when the roof is used. Cricket already has two breaks during a day, it would be possibly to open and closing the roof according to conditions. I dont think it will homogenise conditions.Leaving aside the argument about whether it's possible, rooves tend to homogenise conditions. Some of the best games of cricket happen when they're rain-affected. I mean, if it's the difference between having a game and not (ODI's, for example), I can see the rationale, but scope-creep will inevitably happen, any hint of moisture and the roof will be closed. Boring.
Don't give up on your point bro.more practical and realistic than roofs would perhaps be better ground covers and more flexible regulations of play. .
Edgbaston used to have the Brumbrella which covered the entire outfield, only trouble was it kept breaking down. I am sure that technology has moved on though and something could be done as it is bloody annyoing.more practical and realistic than roofs would perhaps be better ground covers and more flexible regulations of play.
Yesterday at the oval, the players were off for well over two hours even though it only rained for something like 30 mins. first because of tea, then the rain, then the ground was wet. Surely if you can have an early lunch, you can have a late tea. When there is rain around, delay the breaks. (within reason) And it also seems strange that the whole of the ground cant be covered. I seem to remember that english grounds once had ways of doing that. but apparently no more..
It may seem pedantic but it needs to be taken seriously. Lots of people left the ground yesterday before the final session. I doubt they were happy, missing a third of the days play having bought expensive tickets. They could have waited but then had the break been just a few minutes longer they would have waited several hours for nothing.
A cricket ball can easily be belted more than 37 metres up in the air.Don't give up on your point bro.
I think roofs have merit. NZ has a rugby stadium with a roof. Stadium - Forsyth Barr Stadium
It is 37 metres above the playing field. Which was deemed enough for an up and under to be kicked and not touch the roof.
They play cricket under a roof in Australia...A cricket ball can easily be belted more than 37 metres up in the air.
A roof is just not practical.
How high is that roof?They play cricket under a roof in Australia...
38 metres.How high is that roof?
Nah, they use massive heat lamps at all major grounds now, including Etihad stadium.Problem with the roof was safety. Due to the roof the corners of the ground couldn't dry properly and were permanently damp, meaning outfielding was hazardous. Until that gets sorted it's a bit of a no go.