benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's not playing for records, he's playing because he still loves the game and he's still in India's top six batsmen. Who can begrudge him for that?
Not allowing him? What does that even mean?
I think Fred's stating that the selectors may be putting pressure on Tendulkar not to retire.Not allowing him? What does that even mean?
It's an absurd idea, just like the OPNot allowing him? What does that even mean?
Nah, I've always thought him selfish tbh. Won't put himself out for his team one bit.He's not playing for records, he's playing because he still loves the game and he's still in India's top six batsmen. Who can begrudge him for that?
Yeah but you used to get around the Rooty Hill RSL in double denim, so what would you know ****?Nah, I've always thought him selfish tbh. Won't put himself out for his team one bit.
India's Kallis.
Show some respect you son of a bitch. He isn't India's Kallis. Kallis is South Africa's Tendulkar.Nah, I've always thought him selfish tbh. Won't put himself out for his team one bit.
India's Kallis.
They're all just someone else's Neil Harvey.Show some respect you son of a bitch. He isn't India's Kallis. Kallis is South Africa's Tendulkar.
He's preventing me from making a batting wheel. The selfish bastard.
Indeed.Given that only last summer he was India's second best batsman, and the guy in front of him has retired, happen it's the Indian selectors being selfish by not allowing him to retire?
Depends how you define shellfish. If playing on because you love the sport and are still good enough is selfish, then yeah Sachin is shellfish.
I personally define shellfish as headbutting someone and getting a red card just because you were pissed off, and denying your country a World Cup.