• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in England 2012

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I refuse to believe amanuensis only has 121 posts because he's made at least 1,000 posts in the last week or so about how he doesn't believe in batting allrounders in ODIs
 

amanuensis

U19 12th Man
I refuse to believe amanuensis only has 121 posts because he's made at least 1,000 posts in the last week or so about how he doesn't believe in batting allrounders in ODIs
Don't oppose batting allrounders per se (pluralisation?), only in the case of this team - they're fine when you've got a top class upper order.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
No thanks - no more "bits & pieces" rubbish please. If they're going to go in with that top four (ie. a tad pedestrian), then taking wickets is paramount.



:laugh:
Well I'd prefer to go in with those 2 rather than Tredwell. Also think you're being unfair on Patel he's a decent player and far from rubbish in this form of the game and his bowling average is far better than Tredwell's 28 to 32.

I wouldn't say Cook since his return as been anything close to a tad pedestrian, striking at nearly a run a ball. Bell's shown he can score quick if need be, even Ravi did it last game.
 

amanuensis

U19 12th Man
Well I'd prefer to go in with those 2 rather than Tredwell. Also think you're being unfair on Patel he's a decent player and far from rubbish in this form of the game and his bowling average is far better than Tredwell's 28 to 32.

I wouldn't say Cook since his return as been anything close to a tad pedestrian, striking at nearly a run a ball. Bell's shown he can score quick if need be, even Ravi did it last game.
1) Bopara is a patchy performer & a dozy tw*t - I'd happily discard him.
2) Cook has mainly faced pretty ordinary new ball bowling since his return to the side, with the likes of Malinga & Gul being old ball specialists - that makes quick scoring a lot easier for him. This summer will probably give us a much better idea of what he's actually capable of.
3) The same is probably true of Bell.
4) I'm not particularly convinced by Tredwell, but he's more of a specialist bowler than Patel - he's probably the best of a pretty ordinary bunch (sans Swann).
 

Viscount Tom

International Debutant
The Australian's have an attack which the aforementioned Gloucestershireman took apart on their home ground, Lee's got the experience of age but lets be honest only McKay has looked like he was troubling him thus far.
 

amanuensis

U19 12th Man
The Australian's have an attack which the aforementioned Gloucestershireman took apart on their home ground, Lee's got the experience of age but lets be honest only McKay has looked like he was troubling him thus far.
We're talking ODIs here & I'm not just talking about Australia - can you see him averaging 50+ at a strike rate of 90+ over the course of this series & the next one against the Saffers?
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
Can you see anyone in the world doing so?

Of course it could happen, and Cook could easily do it. But I wouldn't be confident of anyone in world cricket doing stuff like that consistantly. Those are ATG stats, which you would expect to get boosted against poor attacks.
 

Viscount Tom

International Debutant
Can see him averaging well into the 40s and well into the 80s which against them attack ni these sort of conditions is perfectly acceptable.
 

weeman27bob

International Vice-Captain
Gutted that the game was cancelled, because if it wasn't, when England beat Australia 5-0, they'd have made the number 1 ranking in ODIs.

That would complete the set as well, with England being ranked number 1 in all three formats, the first team ever to do so, meaning they must be the best team of all time.
 

Jayzamann

International Regular
Gutted that the game was cancelled, because if it wasn't, when England beat Australia 5-0, they'd have made the number 1 ranking in ODIs.

That would complete the set as well, with England being ranked number 1 in all three formats, the first team ever to do so, meaning they must be the best team of all time.
Y'know a big part of me (the masochist) wanted to see that happen.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It might be OK weatherwise for the game at Chester-le-Street. All depends on how much rain has fallen today and how much falls tomorrow. At the moment it looks like Saturday should be dry and fairly bright if not sunny!

Sunshine in the North-East? What will they think of next?
There's some ridiculously heavy squall moving through the North right now, according to my impeccable sources in the region.

Honestly, you ****s are kidding yourselves with this weather. It'll be the first modern Olympiad to be washed out.

****ing dire.
 

stumpski

International Captain
Honestly, you ****s are kidding yourselves with this weather. It'll be the first modern Olympiad to be washed out.

****ing dire.
Too late to put a roof on the stadium? :unsure: Could move a few events to Centre Court I suppose.
 

Top