NasserFan207
International Vice-Captain
Nasser > Cowan, Warner, Watson, Marsh and any other new scrubs currently playing for youYes, and Sami once took a bag full of wickets. It doesn't make him a good bowler.
Nasser > Cowan, Warner, Watson, Marsh and any other new scrubs currently playing for youYes, and Sami once took a bag full of wickets. It doesn't make him a good bowler.
Should probably let the 'new scrubs' complete their career firstNasser > Cowan, Warner, Watson, Marsh and any other new scrubs currently playing for you
So what? Isn't the point that he was nowhere near as good as Taylor, Slater, Boon, Waugh, Waugh, Border, Martyn, Hayden, Langer etc etc? You know, the blokes he played against?Nasser > Cowan, Warner, Watson, Marsh and any other new scrubs currently playing for you
Most players aren't as good as that lot...So what? Isn't the point that he was nowhere near as good as Taylor, Slater, Boon, Waugh, Waugh, Border, Martyn, Hayden, Langer etc etc? You know, the blokes he played against?
His cover drive was definitely superior than any of the aboveSo what? Isn't the point that he was nowhere near as good as Taylor, Slater, Boon, Waugh, Waugh, Border, Martyn, Hayden, Langer etc etc? You know, the blokes he played against?
He just seemed to find his rhythm, he started to find that good fuller length with a much better 4th stump line that got the batsmen playing more at. Earlier on his pace also seemed down, dropping into the high 70's on a few occasions but once it seemed to click for him he was consistently in the mid 80's.What did Broad do differently later on in the day, or was it a case he found a few edges where they'd been going past before?
I think Holding, much like many experts, tends to suffer from generational bias. Its fair game to put some of the players that he played with or against on a pedestal, because the reality is that he played during one of the most gifted decades in international cricket. And he does have a point that Chanderpaul bats for himself more than he does for the team. But I'd be hard pressed to understand the logic behind Dez Haynes rated as a better player than Chanderpaul. Nothing backs it up. Whether Chanderpaul has a Type A or Type B personality doesnt detract from the fact that he has been consistently scoring runs all over the world in all seasons. The guy is playing against arguably the best bowling attack in the world currently in their own backyard and still has a * alongside his name and deserves whole load of credit for it. The fact that he is nearly 38 and has been doing the job for nearly 20 years is not something to be taken lightly.Interesting comments from Holding regarding where he rates Chanderpaul against the other WI great batsmen. Nothing controversial or anything like that, and I gather most of us would agree with his comments, but nevertheless always intriguing to hear.
Started bowling to the Windies tail (starts from Samuels) helped. Still trying to work how Sammy got out, you can’t do that if you tried 100 times. Thought Anderson was more threatening, particularly to Shiv.What did Broad do differently later on in the day, or was it a case he found a few edges where they'd been going past before?
TBF, Marsh has and Cowan will soon enough.Should probably let the 'new scrubs' complete their career first
After tea Anderson bowled a lot of impressive looking balls, but I didn't find it particularly likely that he would get a wicket the way he was bowling.Started bowling to the Windies tail (starts from Samuels) helped. Still trying to work how Sammy got out, you can’t do that if you tried 100 times. Thought Anderson was more threatening, particularly to Shiv.