Lets have a look at Durham players:
Harmison - hammered by the media, constant sniping at his personality
Collingwood - hammered by the media, consistently questioning his place while soft-arse Bell was getting away near scot free
Onions - pretty much forgotten about by everyone except Boycott, if he was from down south, or better still an Asian from down south the media would be camped outside ECB HQ demanding selection
Stokes - see Onions. Crap about him being technically deficient against spin because he got out trying to slog Ashwin.
So yea I don't know where you've been but the facts speak for themselves. The media are a bunch of London-centric ****wits persistly ramming their agenda down the throats of all and sundry. Their agenda is to get their local hero into the side. It's the same with any local press, the only difference is the London tossers have national coverage. If anyone from Slurrey so much as looks like a competent FC player we never hear the end of it. Fact is the dominant sides are mostly northern (Lancs, Notts, Durham) but they get a fraction of the coverage. It happens just the same in football.
Clearly a well balanced individual.
A chip on both shoulders.
And what a heap that was.
Harmison - when in the mental and physical shape for Test cricket was, if anything, a media darling. And when he wasn't he was given more leeway than many.
Collingwood - the media generally undestood his role in the team and showed it due respect. Like any others, if he wasn't making runs his place was questioned.
Onions - three or four good spells in Tests, Quite a few poor ones quickly forgotten. Might (only might) have made a good Test bowler - a poor man's Chris Old from what I've seen (oh, and your stupid tirade about southern - and Asian - seamers getting undue consideration is rather destroyed by the cases of Anderson, and more recently Broad. And I can think of a few bowlers who, if their international career had started like Tim Bresnan's wouldn;t have been seen again). Also rather strugglingto find a seamer of Asian origin from the evil South that has played Test cricket.
Stokes - all the coverage of Stokes I have seen has been positive. Even down to the idea he's 'the new Flintoff' - frankly daft at the moment as his bowling shows no signs of being in the same parish. Again, there have been plenty of who, after a start in ODIs that Stokes has had, would be labelled (by the dim) as no good for ever.
And as for your final "southern bias" tirade - best laugh I've had all week, and it's been quite a funny week........