That's cuz he was just lazy.I never saw him impressed with what I did, it didnt matter how fast I was bowling to him he just wasn't bothered by it. It didn't matter if I was bowling to him in the nets or in a match, the result was the same.
I don't think he was brutal against short bowling as De Silva or Inzy. WI and Aussie pacemen did bounce him a lot, and he played them beutifully by ducking, weawing and pulling some. But against above duo, even the quickest didn't dare to get it up their throats. Basically they intimidated fast bowlers not to bowl short. Viv did that too, but he intimidated fast bowlers not to bowl full as well.Robin Smith was brutal against the fastest men.
Very much AWTA. One of the key assets of playing pace bowling is the ability to cope with swing and having assured footwork against full pitched bowling. I remember Michael Vaughn was a fabulous puller and hooker, but his footwork was often sloppy when the fast bowlers pitched it up, resulting in him being castled a few times by the likes of Lee and Steyn.Yes, that's another error people commit while judging players against a particular type of bowlers.
Good pull shot players are often confused with good players of pace bowling (I know it's an essential quality of playing pace well, but not the only), just like they confuse good six-hitters with good players of spin.
Ridiculous.Inzamam wasn't even the best player of quicks in the sides he played in.
Yeah he basically just dominated sub-continent fast bowling.He is arguably the best player of pace bowling if only Indian, Sri Lankan and Bangladeshi ''quicks'' are considered.
I'll accept Inzamam's status at the top of the fast bowling countering tree if everyone else can accept Imran's other equally valid claim that Mohammad Sami is the next Malcolm Marshall.