Surely going to a wedding or playing cricket for a New Zealand domestic side wouldn't prevent you from qualifying. It was 6 days FFS, it doesn't have that much of a bearing on things."They" is NZC? Shane Bond revisited.
Fair enough. His job security depends on the players, so he should get to pick them.Wright is reluctant to continue in the job under his current terms. He is contracted until the West Indies tour finishes in August. The Herald on Sunday understands he will not demand a salary increase and is happy to concede more administrative responsibility to manager Mike Sandle but, in return, he wants absolute power over the coaching and selection of the team.
itstl. Not sure what to think here because I can't even remember what Buchanan is meant to be doing.Wright is a pragmatist, Buchanan is an analyst. Both have been successful coaches in their careers before joining NZC. However, Wright is believed to want no Buchanan influence around the selection table.
Lolwat. Why are they writing essays when they should be doing something useful?One example had Wright adamant players should not have to fill out a substantial review document of the 2011-12 season. The Herald on Sunday was told Wright preferred more of an old school "sit down with a beer at the bar" approach to counsel players.
Ten points to Steve for calling lawn bowls man. I guess now we know why you no give pie?Wright was also disappointed NZC failed to appoint former Otago and now Kenya coach Mike Hesson to either the selection manager or team manager roles which were eventually secured by ex-Bowls Australia high performance manager Kim Littlejohn and ex-Blues rugby manager Sandle respectively.
Surely by the time the test portion of the West Indies tour comes around, August 2012 those short trips would be outweighed. He thought he was eligible at the start of April. How can you be pushed back 6-8 months?And that Wagner situation is just ****ing ridiculous.
So October is the best case. December if they decide to not let the brother's wedding one slide.The issue appears to have been clouded by Wagner's misconception that because he left South Africa permanently in April 2008, the four-year stand-down also started then. His working visa in New Zealand actually started in October 2008, meaning he has a further six months to serve.
Isn't it 182 days in each year though?So October is the best case. December if they decide to not let the brother's wedding one slide.
Especially when they were burnt once already, and relatively recently to boot. They admitted to Shane Bond they were negligent and mislead him badly.How do you not make sure with the ICC when someone can play as soon as they arrive? Even if Wagner was the biggest hack out, a contracted domestic player intending to qualify deserves a set in stone date and some rules asap.
I see what you mean. Even if we start from Dec 2008, he becomes a 4-year resident at the 3.5 year mark, so June 2012.Isn't it 182 days in each year though?
That was Justin Vaughan's doing, and all this Wagner stuff seems to be under his jurisdiction as well.Anyway, with the amatuer **** ups NZC make time and again, is it any surprise we're 7th in the world?
I still haven't forgiven them for Bond.
It was going to be Daniel Flynn but New Zealand cricket have already told Gloucestershire that he'll be on the plane with Williamson to the Windies. It sounds as though Gloucestershire are pretty keen on a seam bowler to replace him but seeing as New Zealand cricket are paying for the player (basically) it all comes down to them.County Cricket 2012: Kane Williamson to return to Gloucs | Cricket News | Gloucestershire | ESPN Cricinfo
And will be replaced by "another centrally-contracted player, not involved in the West Indies tour."
Well, who knows. Watling perhaps. The only other batsman in NZC's 20 who definitely won't be touring is Broom.