A.F.L. Thread II

[BoyBrumby]

Flagrant soft-****ery is what it is.

Think I may've gone OTT with GWS players meanwhile. Currently have half a dozen.

 

[Spikey]

Got 6. Although Giles is a nobrainer so really it's only 5

 

[BoyBrumby]

Got 6. Although Giles is a nobrainer so really it's only 5

I've got him in the squad, but still can't bring myself to add him into the XXII as second ruckman. The money he'd save could be handy elsewhere so might yet do it.

 

[Spikey]

Yeah I'm not doing that. I've seen people doing it, but it's too risky for me. It's nice to see so many options with rucks though. I'm Ryder Cox Giles and Redden right now. If Giles and/or Redden fire I might trade Ryder/Cox out after R2, but safety first


No idea what GWS players to start and which to bench

 

[morgieb]

Link to the comp please.

 

[Spikey]

are you serious?

Toyota AFL Dream Team 2012 - AFL.com.au
342810

jesus christ

 

[benchmark00]

Nah it's clownish to have two premium/good rucks. One premium and a rookie (Giles/Redden) is all that's needed.

 

[Spikey]

Your face is clownish

 

[Spikey]

2 minutes into the coverage and I'm already sick of Darcy.

 

[benchmark00]

Your face is clownish

Whatever pays the bills babeh.


So we have GWS vs the Swans.

Should be an informed crowd then. Expecting everyone to yell out BALLLLL everytime a goal is scored.

 

[Spikey]

why do they get a point for missing

("shut it ****")

 

[benchmark00]

Applegutzzzzzzzzz

 

[BoyBrumby]

Think "Greater Western Sydney Giants" is quite possibly the worst named team in sport.

 

[benchmark00]

Don't mind it. GWS Giants has a good ring to it imo.

Better than the Columbus Blue Jackets imo.

 

[Spikey]

Think "Greater Western Sydney Giants" is quite possibly the worst named team in sport.

golden state warriors imo

 

[BoyBrumby]

Three toponymic words is at least one too many IMHO.

 

[dontcloseyoureyes]

Think "Greater Western Sydney Giants" is quite possibly the worst named team in sport.

The Montgomery Biscuits disagree.

 

[BoyBrumby]

No expert, but seems like the comms are patronising GWS massively here. Saying how solid they've been and it's 19-1 after ten. Two Swans goals from basic errors too.

 

[Spikey]

No expert, but seems like the comms are patronising GWS massively here. Saying how solid they've been and it's 19-1 after ten. Two Swans goals from basic errors too.

Yep.

GWS doing well tbf, until they kick the thing. It's mostly been up and unders so far....

 

[Spikey]

****. MacDonald's gonna be out for awhile. Looked dreadful in real time.


edit Or maybe not. Spikeyisdumb