How is that less of an advantage than choosing Lohman or Bradman. Additionally he was a very good keeper, especially to spin and that is how he initialy made the team, as a wicket-keeper batsman. When Cricinfo selected their all time W.I. team he was one vote away from surpassing Hendricks for the starting position, and when the ICC was selecting their all time 11 last year, Walcott made their short list (of 10) for wicket-keepers as well. He averaged 40 as a keeper batsman, if u must, use that average in the sim.The thing with Walcott in the sim is that if one is allowed to keep him as wicketkeeper-batsman then he starts with an advantage over even the person who has selected the best wicketkeeper-batsman.
I shall allow you to keep him as wicketkeeper for voting, but not for the sim - otherwise it will be unfair for those who have better wicketkeepers. I can't simulate wicketkeeping ability, but can at least force all to have good wicketkeepers - so that the 'missing factor' of wicketkeeping ability doesn't turn out to be v important in the sim.
Firstly, I shall use my adjusted average for Lohmann or Bradman for the sim, if I include them among my 120 players. So, how much of an advantage is to have them (if at all) will depend on their adjusted averages.How is that less of an advantage than choosing Lohman or Bradman. Additionally he was a very good keeper, especially to spin and that is how he initialy made the team, as a wicket-keeper batsman. He averaged 40 as a keeper batsman, if u want to, use that average in the sim.
He was a wicketkeeper for more than 50% of his test matches, wasn't he? (has kept in more than 20 test matches too) So, he can play as a wicketkeeper if I include him among my 120.How about Andy Flower as wicket-keeper?
I think you said that you'll play only on condition that I disclose the 120 names beforehand. So, I thought you weren't interested with the present rules... Sorry if I misunderstood your words...Sorry Weldone, but am I in? Wasn't included on the list...
Yeah, I'm interested. Was just indicating (poorly) that I think it's hard enough to build a reasonable squad even when you do know the list, let alone without it. I'm sure I'll live, though.I think you said that you'll play only on condition that I disclose the 120 names beforehand. So, I thought you weren't interested with the present rules... Sorry if I misunderstood your words...
Sorry, but will keep you as a reserve in case someone quits in the middle (or has a long absence from the forum)...Yeah, I'm interested. Was just indicating (poorly) that I think it's hard enough to build a reasonable squad even when you do know the list, let alone without it. I'm sure I'll live, though.
You bidding for Ravindra Jadeja?$1,050,000
Nah I would be bidding much higher for Ravindra Jadeja of course.You bidding for Ravindra Jadeja?
Handling budgets might not be too easy imo.Am willing to team up with someone as well if they're interested.