The difference being Trent Boult is 22 years old with a lot of potential and performed well in every innings he bowled apart from the first innings of the first test. He didn't walk into the test match as a 33 year old with 9 wickets @ 59.
He seems to have maintained his pace well over the years.
Nope I'm just taking the piss out of someone who says someone is a horrible selection based on 4 overs because they went for 6.5 apiece. Get a grip. If you don't rate someone fine, but don't say they were a horrible selection based on a run-rate from 4 overs.
Who said that was the only reason I thought it was a horrible selection? That was your flawed assumption which makes you think you can go around posting vile, sarcastic remarks to get a reaction. I'm quite fine with my opinion of rating Trent Boult the better bowler of the two.
And good to see him swinging it both ways and bowling with fire, impressive stuff.
Fine weather.
Well if NZ can knock the Saffies over for around 200, they'll be a big show in this match, bowling last.
They could make 300 from here unless we can get both of these chaps out.
Yeah, hopefully Gillespie comes back from the break nice and fresh so he can break this important partnership. Philander looked competent with the bat as well so there's still a lot of work to do if we want to have a lead or only a small amount to catch up.
