BoyBrumby
Englishman
Lol.Ooh Caucasians fix **** too! How life-affirming!
Edit: err, he's black
Kudos for bringing in the racial angle tho. Classy.
Lol.Ooh Caucasians fix **** too! How life-affirming!
Edit: err, he's black
This is so silly.Westfield got less but he failed to reach his set limits.
Shouldn't really describe him as a criminal, to my mind that word implies a level of guile or cunning that seems to be totally lacking in WestfieldThis is so silly.
Because he tried his best and still didn't reach his target he should be treated as less of a criminal
Its no deterrent though, particularly as it seems his co-conspirator has given an object lesson in how to get away with itless people had an interest - both financially and you know just caring - in this case than the Amir/Asif/Butt case so i'm happy enough with a tad less time.
Well, as the judge refused to accept his guilty plea on the basis that he'd didn't believe that this was Amir's first involvement, I think it's fair to guess there was something that pointed towards it.But there was no evidence of prior involvement for Amir and co, just like Westfield. So how can they be given a longer sentence for it.
Rigging aspects of a Test match which is watched globally is ultimately more serious than rigging aspects of a CC match which is watched by one man and his dog.But there was no evidence of prior involvement for Amir and co, just like Westfield. So how can they be given a longer sentence for it.
Think we should discuss Herschelle Gibbs' prowess in this area, personally.AFAIC the fact that he failed should be irrelevant.
Not sure the guy should get massive credit for telling a couple of junior team mates about it, going abroad to play cricket, and six months later the rumours get to the captain/coach. I mean, it's good he didn't also take the money but I'm sure he should have actually told someone in an official capacity at the club/ECB/ICC what was going on.So, Westfield told Tony Palladino about his spot fixing and Palladino blew the lid on it. Good on him. Both fringe Essex cricketers at the time for whom a few thousand would have been big money, but one of them wasn't having a bar of it. More than can be said for many, by the sounds of it though.
Humph. The usual trusty source of the BBC failed to provide this additional detail.Not sure the guy should get massive credit for telling a couple of junior team mates about it, going abroad to play cricket, and six months later the rumours get to the captain/coach. I mean, it's good he didn't also take the money but I'm sure he should have actually told someone in an official capacity at the club/ECB/ICC what was going on.
Obviously loads of other Essex players are culpable too, it seems as though everyone had an inkling and they just didn't want to spoil the fact Kaneira was winning loads of matches.