smash84
The Tiger King
Ponting has said all along he'd rather be dropped than tapped.
Tap dat ass.
Ponting has said all along he'd rather be dropped than tapped.
Tap dat ass.
**** off!Press conference 11am tomorrow, all over for test cricket too.
Was one of the first to really take the next step in scoring quickly. Loved a goatie. Quick between the wickets and great in the field.Today's news made me realise something - I don't know jack about Ponting's early OD career. Don't know if he was a slow/quick starter, notable innings etc
could be so he can say, "nah ****, I'll be back"Could only be for ODI's tbh.
I won't read a word from the Connman, he's been at Punter all summer.not really much in the papers re ponting quitting tbh. but here's conn's article
Ricky Ponting may choose to quit Test cricket following dumping from one-day side | Herald Sun
Nah, **** that ****. This is professional sport; we don't have to appease Pharaoh Ponting by gently suggesting to him that it's time for him to abdicate the throne; he made himself available and he wasn't chosen in the squad, much like Wes Robinson and Michael Hogan. He was a great one day player for Australia - one of the best ever - and if the selectors have decided that after 375 games, 13,000 runs and his 37th birthday that he's not part of the best side anymore, that doesn't take anything away from what he's done before. I wouldn't have dropped him personally but I like that it is a dropping and not a forced retirement because it shows the strength and professional attitude of the Australian system at the moment, as opposed to - well, your attitude.It says in the article that either Ponting or Inverarity could make the call. But couldnt he have had a chat with Ponting (1-2 days before) informing about the selectors decision to drop him and that he had a couple of days to take a call (before this information went public).
I know I am speculating and that scenario might have been exactly what happened, but just feel that Ponting retiring on his own would have looked much better than the chief selector very publicly dropping him.
If CA wanted to drop him they should have done the same thing in the last two years where his average was just 30, not when a drop from the team almost certainly meant curtains to his international career and the same could have been achieved by a gentle nudge asking him to move on.Nah, **** that ****. This is professional sport; we don't have to appease Pharaoh Ponting by gently suggesting to him that it's time for him to abdicate the throne; he made himself available and he wasn't chosen in the squad, much like Wes Robinson and Michael Hogan. He was a great one day player for Australia - one of the best ever - and if the selectors have decided that after 375 games, 13,000 runs and his 37th birthday that he's not part of the best side anymore, that doesn't take anything away from what he's done before. I wouldn't have dropped him personally but I like that it is a dropping and not a forced retirement because it shows the strength and professional attitude of the Australian system at the moment, as opposed to - well, your attitude.
Lets face it; if he'd "retired" today we'd all be speculating over whether he'd been pushed or not anyway, which is probably more offensive to the man than just accepting that he wanted so much to give everything he could to Australian cricket that he played on right up until the day he was no longer wanted.
Well that's a different argument entirely.If CA wanted to drop him they should have done the same thing in the last two years where his average was just 30
No he doesn't, frankly.After playing 375 games and scoring 13000 runs, Ponting certainly deserves to be treated better than someone who has hardly done anything of note in his career and is getting dropped because of an extended run of poor performance.
We can agree to disagree then, but IMO, the notion that every player is equal and deserves equal treatment is both incorrect and impractical.No he doesn't, frankly.
This is going to seem like a cheap shot, but I think this is part of the reason India aren't quite as good as they should be.We can agree to disagree then, but IMO, the notion that every player is equal and deserves equal treatment is both incorrect and impractical.
Individuals are what make the game a joy to watch. Why would I want to watch a Raina getting bounced out or Haddin attempting an idiotic shot every time when you have players like Lara, SRT or Punter playing majestically?
Better players deserve better treatment than mediocre hacks.