• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan and England in UAE

Who do you think will win?!


  • Total voters
    88

LegionOfBrad

International Debutant
Broad seems to have dropped his pace a bit in tests to me, he used to be regularly around 90mph but against India and Pakistan it was normally 83-85mph, it seems to have done him the world of good.
Yep dropped his pace and went for "top of upstump" after the Sri Lanka series and promptly averaged about 11 against India. Hi average has come down from 34 to 30 in less than a year since that.
 

Pup Clarke

Cricketer Of The Year
I am a massive Finn fan, love the bloke. But there is no basis to say Finn is better than Bresnan right now other than gut feel based on ODIs since August/September last year.
IMO alot of good decisions can still be made even when having 'a gut feeling' over a selection. Think about the likes of Pattinson, Bracewell and Starc recently.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
It's certainly false to disregard what Finn's done lately just because he's wearing the wrong trousers. Bowling fast, accurately and with movement tends to work in Tests as well as anywhere.

However, it's a matter of whether there's enough evidence for you that he can keep it going, not just for your standard bowling reliability but also in fitness and stamina terms.

Can he keep bowling at these speeds at the end of the day? Can he keep hitting that length in the 8th,. 9th, 10th over of a spell? Two 5-over spells just don't compare to the 20 overs a day he could be put through in a Test.

People like to think that Finn bowling this fast has come out of nowhere, but it hasn't. Him bowling this well has done, sure, but going by the clock he was bowling 90+ consistently in the ODIs in Australia after looking jaded in the Tests. That may well have changed - he's beefed up at the very least - but we don't have the evidence in front of us. For me, the jury's still out on him as a Test bowler.
 
Last edited:

Jacknife

International Captain
It's certainly false to disregard what Finn's done lately just because he's wearing the wrong trousers. Bowling fast, accurately and with movement tends to work in Tests as well as anywhere.

It's just a matter of whether there's enough evidence for you that he can keep it going, not just for your standard bowling reliability but also in fitness and stamina terms.

Can he keep bowling at these speeds at the end of the day? Can he keep hitting that length in the 8th,. 9th, 10th over of a spell? Two 5-over spells just don't compare to the 20 overs a day he could be put through in a Test.

People like to think that Finn bowling this fast has come out of nowhere, but it hasn't. Him bowling this well has done, sure, but going by the clock he was bowling 90+ consistently in the ODIs in Australia after looking jaded in the Tests. That may well have changed - he's beefed up at the very least - but we don't have the evidence in front of us. For me, the jury's still out on him as a Test bowler.
Yes it is false but on the basis of his one day showing alone, I wouldn't pick him ahead of Bresnan, who has shown he can bowl very well in Tests. Anyway it's not as if it will come down to dropping one for the other, with injuries and the amount of games, Finn will get a chance to shine.
 

Agent Nationaux

International Coach
Riaz can also bowl 90 plus consistently in the ODI's, but drops his pace in the tests. It's only guys like Akhtar and Lee who could bowl at those speeds in Tests.
 

screamingfields

School Boy/Girl Captain
Riaz can also bowl 90 plus consistently in the ODI's, but drops his pace in the tests. It's only guys like Akhtar and Lee who could bowl at those speeds in Tests.
Consistently. Riaz can't consistently hit 90. Neither can Gul. Pakistan look like if they lack seam bowlers, let alone pace from their current bowlers.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
It's certainly false to disregard what Finn's done lately just because he's wearing the wrong trousers. Bowling fast, accurately and with movement tends to work in Tests as well as anywhere.

However, it's a matter of whether there's enough evidence for you that he can keep it going, not just for your standard bowling reliability but also in fitness and stamina terms.

Can he keep bowling at these speeds at the end of the day? Can he keep hitting that length in the 8th,. 9th, 10th over of a spell? Two 5-over spells just don't compare to the 20 overs a day he could be put through in a Test.

People like to think that Finn bowling this fast has come out of nowhere, but it hasn't. Him bowling this well has done, sure, but going by the clock he was bowling 90+ consistently in the ODIs in Australia after looking jaded in the Tests. That may well have changed - he's beefed up at the very least - but we don't have the evidence in front of us. For me, the jury's still out on him as a Test bowler.
Agree. Would also be interesting to see how Finn goes with a 50 over old ball. We have seen that Bresnan can be efficient with the old ball.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
The big question is going forward is - if Bresnan wasn't considered one of the best four bowlers, would he be selected as an allrounder ahead of Morgan/Bopara/Taylor/whoever they think the next best batsman is? If Panesar was the fourth of those bowlers I'd definitely think so, but if it was Finn instead, would the attack actually be able to utilise the skills of a fourth seamer? Bresnan is definitely a much, much better cricketer than Morgan but selecting him might be a bit of a cop out and not actually in the team's best interests. Morgan, warts and all, is the better batsman of the two and Bresnan's bowling as the fourth seamer in a side that also includes Swann might not have much impact.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Its a mark of the ludicrous talent England have in the bowling stocks that a guy averaging 23 with the ball and 45 with the bat is having his place in the team debated :ph34r: Must be a lovely problem to have.

In the early 90's if those numbers were reversed he prob still would have made it into the team as a good honest allrounder.
So, so true. Didn't even need to be that good...
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
The big question is going forward is - if Bresnan wasn't considered one of the best four bowlers, would he be selected as an allrounder ahead of Morgan/Bopara/Taylor/whoever they think the next best batsman is? If Panesar was the fourth of those bowlers I'd definitely think so, but if it was Finn instead, would the attack actually be able to utilise the skills of a fourth seamer? Bresnan is definitely a much, much better cricketer than Morgan but selecting him might be a bit of a cop out and not actually in the team's best interests. Morgan, warts and all, is the better batsman of the two and Bresnan's bowling as the fourth seamer in a side that also includes Swann might not have much impact.
I think it probably depends on the conditions. In bowler friendly conditions probably not but on flat tracks Bresnan as a 4th seamer would probably be a very valuable asset.

Having said that the UAE were supposed to be flat tracks and we wouldn't have really needed 5 bowlers there so I don't know.
 

stumpski

International Captain
Pleased to see England making some changes - no point taking a squad of 15 if you're just going to play the same eleven in every match - and looking forward to seeing Briggs and Buttler. Were they both in good form on the A tour?
 

Top