Nah he said Swann > Panesar > Ajmal.which means that Panesar > Swann
watAjmal against some of the top batsmen in Tests
...
Ramnaresh Sarwan
wat wat watSwann against some of the top batsmen in Tests
...
Suresh Raina
Think it's just comparing the batsmen Swann and Ajmal have done best and worst at to be fairwat wat wat
Those two aren't even near the top 20 batsmen in the world, the title was a bit misleading tbh.Think it's just comparing the batsmen Swann and Ajmal have done best and worst at to be fair
And Swann outside SC without a doubt. Ajmal's variations make him a worse bowler in places where patience and flight are more important.No doubt that I'd be picking Ajmal in the subcontinent, none at all; the doosra allows him to bowl a straighter line than Swann bringing LBW into play more with right handers.
I'd agree at this point, Ajmal did look very pedestrian in Australia once batsmen became set. However, that was early in his Test career, and was decent in England when his team's batting was dreadful. I'd still pick Swann, and esp. so with his batting/fielding thrown in, but you'd almost have to bracket the two of them together in the same class soon/now.And Swann outside SC without a doubt. Ajmal's variations make him a worse bowler in places where patience and flight are more important.
They'll be entertaining the crowds on Boxing Day 2016.I don't think Ajmal would really like the extra bounce down here. Having said that, when do they next play here? Can't be for a while...