• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Pakistan and England in UAE

Who do you think will win?!


  • Total voters
    88

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So bloody annoying, 1 pathetic hour cost us the last match we dominated and now we are blitzing them. Should stop the cries of our attack being over rated though, clearly the best unit in the world as they don't rely on one type of bowling to do the job.
 

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So bloody annoying, 1 pathetic hour cost us the last match we dominated and now we are blitzing them. Should stop the cries of our attack being over rated though, clearly the best unit in the world as they don't rely on one type of bowling to do the job.
Echo that - in some ways I'd be happier if they were 60-2
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So bloody annoying, 1 pathetic hour cost us the last match we dominated and now we are blitzing them. Should stop the cries of our attack being over rated though, clearly the best unit in the world as they don't rely on one type of bowling to do the job.
Yep. Lifting for dead rubber asserts an attacks dominance.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
From the commentary it sounds as though If England had been particularly lucky Pakistan would have been all out before lunch, comfortably.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Yep. Lifting for dead rubber asserts an attacks dominance.
Yeah because they didn't well enough in the first two Tests. Stop trolling ya sad ****. If you don't think the game holds any meaning at all then stop watching it and **** off out of the thread.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
From the commentary it sounds as though If England had been particularly lucky Pakistan would have been all out before lunch, comfortably.
Not really. A couple of wickets were down to poor shot selection when the ball was still swinging, probably due to the fact that the middle order hasn't been facing much of the swinging ball in the recent past. Younis played an unnecessary poke, a couple of the LBWs were a result of playing across the line too early in the innings and the less said about Rehman's journey down the wicket, the better.

Can't take anything away from Broad and Anderson though, targeted the stumps and created movement, they deserve all those wickets.
 
Last edited:

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah because they didn't well enough in the first two Tests. Stop trolling ya sad ****. If you don't think the game holds any meaning at all then stop watching it and **** off out of the thread.
Lol. You've become Richard, with an inferior vocabulary.

Go make a spreadsheet.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Not really. A couple of wickets were down to poor shot selection when the ball was still swinging, probably due to the fact that the middle order hasn't been facing much of the swinging ball in the recent past. Younis played an unnecessary poke, a couple of the LBWs were a result of playing across the line too early in the innings and the less said about Rehman's journey down the wicket, the better.

Can't take anything away from Broad and Anderson though, targeted the stumps and created movement, they deserve all those wickets.
How does any of that relate to England not being particularly lucky otherwise Pakistan could have been all out before lunch?

Broad and Anderson went past the outside edge umpteen times, other edges went for runs. Two went to hand.
 

Top